Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of Postmortem Imaging Assessment of Brain: Liver Volume Ratios with Pathological Validation.
Shelmerdine, Susan C; Chung, Kimberly L; Hutchinson, John C; Elliott, Claire; Sebire, Neil J; Arthurs, Owen J.
Afiliación
  • Shelmerdine SC; Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, susan.shelmerdine@gosh.nhs.uk.
  • Chung KL; Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hutchinson JC; Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Elliott C; Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
  • Sebire NJ; Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Arthurs OJ; Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Fetal Diagn Ther ; 46(6): 360-367, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30970374
INTRODUCTION: Organ volumes at postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMR) should reflect autopsy organ weights, and thus brain:liver volume ratios on imaging could be a surrogate for weight volume ratios at autopsy to indicate fetal growth restriction (FGR). This study aims to determine whether imaging-based organ volume ratios can replace autopsy organ weight ratios. Materials and Meth ods: An unselected cohort of perinatal deaths underwent PMMR prior to autopsy. Semiautomated brain and liver volumes were compared to autopsy organ weights and ratios. Ratios were compared using Bland-Altman plots, and intra- and interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS: A total 49 fetuses (25 male, 51%) at 17-42 weeks gestation were -assessed. There was a reasonable correlation between autopsy-derived brain:liver weight ratios (AB:LwR) and imaging-derived brain:liver volume ratios (IB:LvR; r = 0.8). The mean difference between AB:LwR and IB:LvR was +0.7 (95% limits of agreement range -1.5 to +2.9). In a small subset where FGR was present, the optimal IB:LvR ≥5.5 gave 83.3% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity for diagnosis. There was acceptable agreement within readers (mean difference in IB:LvRs 0.77 ± 2.21) and between readers -0.36 ± 0.68. CONCLUSION: IB:LvR provides a surrogate evaluation of AB:LwRs, and may be used as a marker of FGR where autopsy is declined.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal / Hígado Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Fetal Diagn Ther Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA / PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal / Hígado Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Fetal Diagn Ther Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA / PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...