Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality characteristics and flavor compounds of pork meat as a function of carcass quality grade
Hoa, Van Ba; Seong, Pil-Nam; Cho, Soo-Hyun; Kang, Sun-Moon; Kim, Yun-Seok; Moon, Sung-Sil; Choi, Yong-Min; Kim, Jin-Hyoung; Seol, Kuk-Hwan.
Afiliación
  • Hoa VB; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Seong PN; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Cho SH; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Kang SM; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Kim YS; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Moon SS; Sunjin Meat Research Center, Ansung 17532, Korea.
  • Choi YM; National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Kim JH; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
  • Seol KH; National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ; 32(9): 1448-1457, 2019 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010986
ABSTRACT

Objective:

The present work aimed at evaluating the effects of carcass quality grade on the quality characteristics of pork meat according to Korean carcass quality grade system.

Method:

Pork carcasses with varying in quality grades (QG) 1+ (QG1+, n=10), 1 (QG1, n=10) and 2 (QG2, n=10), were used to evaluate the relationship between carcass quality grade and meat quality. The meat quality traits, fatty acid profiles, flavor compounds and sensory qualities were measured on the longissimus dorsi muscle samples of these carcasses.

Results:

Pork meat of higher quality grade (GQ1+) presented significantly higher fat content (5.43%), C182n-6 level (19.03%) and total unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) content (62.72%). Also, the QG1+ meat was significantly higher in levels of classes of flavor compounds such as aldehydes, alcohols and hydrocarbons in comparison to those of the meat samples from the lower GQ groups. The sensory evaluation results (flavor, juiciness, tenderness and acceptability scores) of QG1+ meat was significantly higher than the QG1 and QG2 meats. The pork with lower QG (i.e., QG2) was found positively correlated to redness (r=0.987), C181n-9 level (r=1.000) but negatively correlated to the fat content (r=-0.949), and flavor (r=-0.870), juiciness (r=-0.861), tenderness (r=-0.862) and acceptability (r=-0.815) scores.

Conclusion:

The pork with higher quality grade had higher fat content, total unsaturated fatty acids and better eating quality, thus producing pork with higher quality grades should be considered in order to satisfy the consumer's expectation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...