Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bidirectional signal exchanges and their mechanisms during joint attention interaction - A hyperscanning fMRI study.
Goelman, Gadi; Dan, Rotem; Stößel, Gabriela; Tost, Heike; Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas; Bilek, Edda.
Afiliación
  • Goelman G; Department of Neurology, Hadassah Medical Center, The Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: gadig@hadassah.org.il.
  • Dan R; Department of Neurology, Hadassah Medical Center, The Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel; Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Stößel G; Department of Clinical Psychology, Germany.
  • Tost H; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Meyer-Lindenberg A; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Bilek E; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Neuroimage ; 198: 242-254, 2019 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31112784
ABSTRACT
Social interactions are essential to our daily life. We tested the hypothesis that social interactions during joint attention (JA) require bidirectional communication, each with a different mechanism. We used a novel multivariate functional connectivity analysis, which enables obtaining directed pathways between four regions at each time-frequency point, with hyper-scanning MRI data of real-time JA interaction. Constructing multiple "4-regional directed pathways" and counting the number of times, regions engaged in feedforward or feedback processes in the 'sender' or the 'receiver brains, we obtained the following. (1) There were more regions in feedforward than in feedback processes (125 versus 99). (2) The right hemisphere was more involved in feedforward (74 versus 33), while the left hemisphere in feedback (66 versus 51). (3) The dmPFC was more engaged in feedforward (73 versus 44) while the TPJ in both (49 versus 45). (4) The dmPFC was more involved in the sending processes (i.e. initiation of feedforward and feedback) while the TPJ in the receiving processes. (5) JA interaction was involved with high MRI frequencies (0.04-0.1 Hz), while continues interactions by low MRI frequencies (0.01-0.04 Hz). (6) Initiation and responding to JA (i.e. IJA and RJA) evolved with composite neural systems similar systems for pathways that included the dmPFC, vmPFC and the STS, and different systems for pathways that included the TPJ, vmPFC, PCC and the STS. These findings have important consequences in the basic understanding of social interaction and could help in diagnose and follow-up of social impairments.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención / Encéfalo / Relaciones Interpersonales Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención / Encéfalo / Relaciones Interpersonales Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...