Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Unilateral versus Bilateral Breast Reconstruction on Procedure Choices and Outcomes.
Taylor, Erin M; Wilkins, Edwin G; Pusic, Andrea L; Qi, Ji; Kim, Hyungjin Myra; Hamill, Jennifer B; Guldbrandsen, Gretchen E; Chun, Yoon S.
Afiliación
  • Taylor EM; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Wilkins EG; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Pusic AL; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Qi J; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Kim HM; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Hamill JB; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Guldbrandsen GE; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
  • Chun YS; From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the Section of Plastic Surgery and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 143(6): 1159e-1168e, 2019 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31136472
BACKGROUND: In choosing between implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction, surgeons and patients must weigh relative risks and benefits. However, differences in outcomes across procedure types may vary between unilateral versus bilateral reconstructions. Procedure-related differences in complications and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated for unilateral and bilateral reconstruction. METHODS: Complications and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q and Patient-Reported Outcomes measurement Information System surveys) were assessed at 2 years for patients undergoing autologous or implant-based reconstructions. Stratified regression models compared outcomes between autologous and implant-based reconstructions, separately for unilateral and bilateral cohorts. RESULTS: Among 2125 patients, 917 underwent unilateral (600 implant and 317 autologous) and 1208 underwent bilateral (994 implant and 214 autologous) reconstructions. Complication rates were significantly higher in the autologous versus implant-based group for both unilateral (overall: OR, 2.50, p < 0.001; major: OR, 2.19, p = 0.001) and bilateral (overall: OR, 2.13, p < 0.001; major: OR, 1.69, p = 0.014) cohorts. In unilateral reconstruction, the autologous group demonstrated significantly better patient-reported outcomes versus implant-based group in satisfaction with breast (mean difference, 9.85; p < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (mean difference, 4.84; p = 0.006), and sexual well-being (mean difference, 11.42; p < 0.001). In bilateral reconstruction, the autologous group demonstrated significantly higher patient-reported outcomes only for satisfaction with breast (mean difference, 5.13; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although autologous reconstruction is associated with significantly better patient-reported outcomes compared to implant-based techniques in unilateral reconstruction, procedure choice has far less impact in bilateral reconstruction. Autologous procedures have higher complications rates in both unilateral and bilateral settings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Mamoplastia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Mamoplastia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...