Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Educational Interventions to Enhance Adolescent Specific Vaccination Coverage.
Underwood, Natasha L; Gargano, Lisa M; Sales, Jessica; Vogt, Tara M; Seib, Katherine; Hughes, James M.
Afiliación
  • Underwood NL; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE, MS F-64 (mailing), Atlanta, GA 30341.
  • Gargano LM; Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Room 446, Atlanta, GA 30329.
  • Sales J; Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322.
  • Vogt TM; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS A19, Atlanta, GA 30329.
  • Seib K; IANPHI, Global Health Institute, Emory University, 1599 Clifton Road Room 6.403, Atlanta, GA 30322.
  • Hughes JM; Emory University School of Medicine, 1462 Clifton Road Room 446, Atlanta, GA 30322.
J Sch Health ; 89(8): 603-611, 2019 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31161606
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In this study, we assessed impact of two educational interventions designed to increase coverage of three vaccines recommended during adolescence among Georgia middle and high school students (tetanus diphtheria pertussis [Tdap], meningococcal [MenACWY], and human papillomavirus [HPV] vaccines).

METHODS:

We randomized 11 middle and high schools in one school district into one of three arms (1) control; (2) educational intervention for parents only (P only); and (3) multicomponent educational intervention for parents and adolescents (P + A), which consisted of educational brochures for parents about vaccines recommended during adolescence and a vaccine-focused curriculum delivered to adolescents by science teachers. We obtained vaccination coverage data during intervention years from the state immunization registry.

RESULTS:

Odds of receiving at least one vaccine during the study were higher among adolescents in P + A arm compared to control (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.1-2.0). Adolescents in P + A arm had greater odds of receiving at least one vaccine compared with those in P only arm (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS:

A multicomponent educational intervention for adolescents and parents increased adolescent vaccination uptake. Results suggest similar interventions can increase awareness and demand for vaccines among parents and adolescents.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 3_ND / 4_TD Problema de salud: 3_zoonosis / 4_meningitis Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Escolar / Cobertura de Vacunación / Vacunas contra Papillomavirus Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Sch Health Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 3_ND / 4_TD Problema de salud: 3_zoonosis / 4_meningitis Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Escolar / Cobertura de Vacunación / Vacunas contra Papillomavirus Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Sch Health Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...