Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Patient Experience Debrief Interview: How Conversations With Hospitalized Families Influence Medical Student Learning and Reflection.
Chua, Ian S; Bogetz, Alyssa L; Bhansali, Priti; Long, Michele; Holbreich, Rachael; Kind, Terry; Ottolini, Mary; Park, Yoon Soo; Lineberry, Matthew; Hirshfield, Laura E.
Afiliación
  • Chua IS; I.S. Chua is assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, and clinical instructor, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California. A.L. Bogetz is associate program director, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California. P. Bhansali is associate professor, Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC. M. Long is associate professor, Department of Pediat
Acad Med ; 94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions): S86-S94, 2019 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31365398
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine the effect of patient debrief interviews on pediatric clerkship student depth of reflection and learning.

METHOD:

The authors conducted a multi-institutional, mixed-methods, cluster randomized trial among pediatric clerkship students from May 2016 to February 2017. Intervention students completed a debrief interview with a patient-caregiver, followed by a written reflection on the experience. Control students completed a written reflection on a memorable patient encounter. Three blinded authors scored written reflections according to the 4-level REFLECT rubric to determine depth of reflection. Interrater reliability was examined using kappa. REFLECT scores were analyzed using a chi-square test; essays were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS:

Eighty percent of eligible students participated. One hundred eighty-nine essays (89 control, 100 intervention) were scored. Thirty-seven percent of the control group attained reflection and critical reflection, the 2 highest levels of reflection, compared with 71% of the intervention group; 2% of the control group attained critical reflection, the highest level, compared with 31% of the intervention group (χ(3, N = 189) = 33.9, P < .001). Seven themes were seen across both groups, 3 focused on physician practice and 4 focused on patients. Patient-centered themes were more common in the intervention group, whereas physician-focused themes were more common in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patient debrief interviews offer a unique approach to deepen self-reflection through direct dialogue and exploration of patient-caregiver experiences during hospitalization.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pediatría / Estudiantes de Medicina / Entrevistas como Asunto / Prácticas Clínicas / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina / Retroalimentación Formativa Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pediatría / Estudiantes de Medicina / Entrevistas como Asunto / Prácticas Clínicas / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina / Retroalimentación Formativa Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Med Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...