Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Assessments: Results of a Retrospective Listening Study.
de Boer, Gillian; Marino, Viviane Christina de Castro; Dutka, Jeniffer de Cassia Rillo; Pegoraro-Krook, Maria Inês; Bressmann, Tim.
Afiliación
  • de Boer G; Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Marino VCC; Speech-Language and Audiology Department, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, Marília, Brazil.
  • Dutka JCR; Department of Speech-Language and Audiology, College of Dentistry of Bauru, and Graduate Programs, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, and College of Dentistry of Bauru, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
  • Pegoraro-Krook MI; Department of Speech-Language and Audiology, College of Dentistry of Bauru, and Graduate Programs, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, and College of Dentistry of Bauru, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
  • Bressmann T; Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 57(4): 448-457, 2020 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537110
OBJECTIVE: Reliable perceptual and instrumental assessment of oral-nasal balance disorders is a persistent problem in speech-language pathology. The goal of the study was to evaluate whether nasalance-based preclassification of oral-nasal balance disorders improves listener agreement. DESIGN: Retrospective listening study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four randomly selected recordings of patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Three experienced speech-language pathologists participated as expert listeners. INTERVENTIONS: Two listening experiments were based on nasalance scores and audio recordings of speakers with repaired UCLP. The speakers were preclassified as normal, hypernasal, hyponasal, or mixed based on their nasalance scores. Initially, the listeners determined the diagnostic category of the oral-nasal balance for 62 audio recordings (8 repeats). Six months later, they listened to 38 of the recordings (6 repeats) along with a spreadsheet indicating the nasalance-based categories for the oral-nasal balance. The listeners confirmed, or rejected and corrected, the nasalance-based preclassification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intralistener, interlistener agreement, and agreement between listener categories and nasalance-based oral-nasal balance categories. RESULTS: In the first study, the agreement between the listeners' diagnostic category and the nasalance-based category was 45.1% and the interlistener agreement was 36.7%. In the second study, the agreement between the listeners' category and the nasalance-based category was 67.1% (75% agreement for the correct nasalance-based categories and 41.7% for the misclassifications), and the interlistener agreement was 85.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Preclassification of oral-nasal balance disorders based on nasalance scores may help listeners achieve better diagnostic accuracy and higher agreement.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos del Habla / Enfermedades Nasales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos del Habla / Enfermedades Nasales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...