Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Shi-Style Cervical Mobilizations Versus Massage for Cervical Vertigo: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Yao, Min; Tang, Zhan-Ying; Cui, Xue-Jun; Sun, Yue-Li; Ye, Xiu-Lan; Wang, Ping; Zhong, Wei-Hong; Zhang, Rui-Chun; Li, Hui-Ying; Hu, Zhi-Jun; Wang, Wei-Min; Qiao, Wei-Ping; Li, Jun; Gao, Yang; Shi, Qi; Wang, Yong-Jun.
Afiliación
  • Yao M; Institute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Tang ZY; Rehabilitation Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Cui XJ; Institute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Sun YL; Institute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Ye XL; Rehabilitation Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang P; Orthopaedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhong WH; Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang RC; Tuina Department, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Urumqi, China.
  • Li HY; Orthopaedics and Traumatology, First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Hu ZJ; Rehabilitation Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang WM; Orthopaedics and Traumatology, First Teaching Hospital, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
  • Qiao WP; Orthopaedics and Traumatology, First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Li J; Rehabilitation Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Gao Y; Rehabilitation Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Shi Q; Institute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang YJ; Institute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Altern Complement Med ; 26(1): 58-66, 2020 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580705
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Large sample and high-quality evidence to evaluate the preliminary safety of the mobilizations and massage for cervical vertigo are not yet available. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the comparative effectiveness and preliminary safety of Shi-style cervical mobilizations (SCM) compared with traditional massage (TM) in cervical vertigo patients.

Design:

A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a 11 allocation ratio. Settings Five academic medical centers.

Subjects:

A total of 360 adult patients with a diagnosis of cervical vertigo.

Interventions:

The patients were randomly allocated to either an SCM (n = 180) or TM (n = 180) group. The patients were treated during six sessions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) total scale score, and secondary outcomes included the DHI subscales, Chinese version of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (CSF-36), and adverse events (AEs). Outcomes were assessed in the short term at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months, and in the intermediate term at 6 months after randomization.

Results:

Significant changes were observed from the baseline in the DHI total scale and subscales at 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months in both groups (all p < 0.05). However, the differences between the two groups were not significant (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, we noted significant changes from the baseline in SF-36 scores at 2 weeks in both groups (all p < 0.05), whereas CSF-36 scores were not significantly higher in the SCM group (all p > 0.05) compared with the TM group. No serious AEs were reported in either of the two groups.

Conclusions:

No differences in outcomes were detected between the SCM and TM groups in terms of treatment of cervicogenic dizziness. Efficacy trials are required to determine whether the improvement observed for each treatment was causally related to the interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis Asunto principal: Vértigo / Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas / Masaje Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Altern Complement Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARES Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis Asunto principal: Vértigo / Manipulaciones Musculoesqueléticas / Masaje Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Altern Complement Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARES Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...