Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world treatment patterns among patients with advanced gastric cancer in Russia: a chart review study.
Tjulandin, Sergei A; Tryakin, Alexey A; Besova, Natalia S; Sholokhova, Evgeniya; Ivanova, Jasmina I; Cheng, Wendy Y; Schmerold, Luke M; Thompson-Leduc, Philippe; Novick, Diego.
Afiliación
  • Tjulandin SA; N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • Tryakin AA; N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • Besova NS; N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  • Sholokhova E; Lilly Pharma, Moscow, Russia.
  • Ivanova JI; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Cheng WY; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Schmerold LM; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Thompson-Leduc P; Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
  • Novick D; Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, UK.
J Drug Assess ; 8(1): 150-158, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31656688
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Little evidence is available on the management of patients with metastatic and/or unresectable gastric cancer (mGC) after the failure of first-line treatment. This study presents real-world data on characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with mGC in Russia.

Methods:

Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with mGC ≥ January 1, 2012, received first-line chemotherapy followed by second-line chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC), had ≥3 months of follow-up after the start of second-line chemotherapy or BSC (except in cases of death), and had not participated in a clinical trial. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results:

A total of 88 physicians provided data from 202 charts. Mean age at mGC diagnosis was 53.7 (standard deviation 11.2) years; 70.8% of patients were male. Reasons for first-line treatment discontinuation included disease progression (50.5%) and adverse events/toxicity (39.1%). There were 52 unique treatment regimens prescribed in second-line; capecitabine (14.5%), paclitaxel (9.3%), and capecitabine + oxaliplatin (8.7%) were the most frequent. Reasons for second-line treatment discontinuation included disease progression (39.8%) and patient refusal to continue (37.5%). During 2nd-line treatment, the most common treatment-related symptoms were nausea/vomiting (75.0%), while pain (73.8%) was the most common disease-related symptom. Antiemetics (63.4%), chemotherapy (61.6%), non-narcotic analgesics (48.3%), endoscopy (45.9%), and nutritional support (35.5%) were most frequently used as supportive care.

Conclusions:

Second-line treatment patterns for patients with mGC in Russia are heterogeneous. Results of this study indicate the need for more intensive implementation of the most active regimens in second-line treatment of mGC according to international and national guidelines.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Drug Assess Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Rusia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Drug Assess Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Rusia
...