Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining an Appropriate Outcome Measure in Neurosurgical Research: Investigating Meaningful, Valid, and Practical Metrics.
Louie, Christopher; D'Agostino, Erin N; Han, David; Ryken, Timothy C.
Afiliación
  • Louie C; Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA.
  • D'Agostino EN; Neurosurgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, USA.
  • Han D; Urology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, USA.
  • Ryken TC; Neurosurgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, USA.
Cureus ; 11(9): e5610, 2019 Sep 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31700723
Given the rapidly evolving pace of research and technology in the neurosurgical field, it is critical to consider the parameters of valid, practical, and meaningful study outcome measures. Here we review fundamental aspects of selecting outcome measures in the context of neurosurgical research. Exemplifying work in meningiomas and high-grade gliomas, we delineate a proposed framework for identifying an appropriate outcome measure. Four fundamental components of an outcome measure are defined and characterized: understanding characteristics of a good outcome measure; developing a research question to address an outcome measure; defining the outcome measure, and considering limitations of an outcome measure. This four-part framework enhances and promotes the methodology for determining if an outcome measure is valid, practical, and ultimately meaningful.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...