Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sequential molecular and cytologic analyses provides a complementary approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a decade of clinical practice.
Sakhdari, Ali; Moghaddam, Parnian Ahmadi; Pejchal, Martina; Cosar, Ediz F; Hutchinson, Lloyd.
Afiliación
  • Sakhdari A; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: asakhdari@gmail.com.
  • Moghaddam PA; Department of Pathology, Lakeridge Hospital, University of Toronto, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
  • Pejchal M; Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Cosar EF; Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
  • Hutchinson L; Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
J Am Soc Cytopathol ; 9(1): 38-44, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711852
INTRODUCTION: Many pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are of neoplastic nature with potential to progress to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Early stratification of patients to either clinical observation or surgical intervention can considerably increase the survival rate. Recent studies have shown the value of molecular analysis to current diagnostic modalities.The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic improvement by utilizing multiple sequential cytologic and molecular cyst fluid analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 58 patients for whom multiple endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of cyst fluid specimens were available. Specimens were subjected to next generation sequencing to identify any recurrent gene mutations commonly found in PCL. The molecular findings were compared with cytologic and final diagnoses. RESULTS: Cytologic diagnoses were classified into 3 groups: non-diagnostic (first visit: 33.9%, cumulative: 15.8%, P = 0.03), negative (1st visit: 53.6%, cumulative: 56.1%, P = 0.85) and atypical/suspicious/positive (first visit: 12.5%, cumulative: 28.1%, P = 0.06). The mutational analyses were clustered into indeterminate/failure (first visit: 1.7%, cumulative: 0%), KRAS/GNAS/VHL group (first visit: 50.0%, cumulative: 53.4%) and any mutation (first visit: 50.0%, cumulative: 53.4%). Mutational analysis identifies up to 72% and 71% whereas cytologic analysis classified up to 46% and 63% of lesions correctly in first and multiple visits, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The cytology and molecular analyses provide a complementary approach to patients with PCL. Power of molecular analysis in detection of a neoplastic lesion is significantly higher in one visit (P = 0.01) with comparable detection rates (P = 0.43) for both cytologic and molecular analyses after multiple visits.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quiste Pancreático / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Soc Cytopathol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Quiste Pancreático / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Soc Cytopathol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
...