Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevention of Occupational Diseases in Turkey: Deriving Lessons From Journey of Surveillance.
Sen, Seyhan; Barlas, Gülsen; Yakistiran, Selçuk; Derin, Ilknur G; Serifi, Berna A; Özlü, Ahmet; Braeckman, Lutgart; van der Laan, Gert; van Dijk, Frank.
Afiliación
  • Sen S; Coordination Unit for Multisectoral Health Responsibility Program, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Barlas G; Department of Health Threats, Early Warning and Response, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yakistiran S; Provincial Health Directorate, Occupational Health Unit, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Derin IG; Provincial Health Directorate, Bursa, Turkey.
  • Serifi BA; Provincial Health Directorate, Kocaeli, Turkey.
  • Özlü A; Occupational Health Department, General Directorate of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Braeckman L; Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Belgium.
  • van der Laan G; Department of Public Health, Free University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Dijk F; Department of Public Health, Free University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Saf Health Work ; 10(4): 420-427, 2019 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31890324
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

To prevent and manage the societal and economic burden of occupational diseases (ODs), countries should develop strong prevention policies, health surveillance and registry systems. This study aims to contribute to the improvement of OD surveillance at national level as well as to identify priority actions in Turkey.

METHODS:

The history and current status of occupational health studies were considered from the perspective of OD surveillance. Interpretative research was done through literature review on occupational health at national, regional and international level. Analyses were focused on countries' experiences in policy development and practice, roles and responsibilities of institutions, multidisciplinary and intersectoral collaboration. OD surveillance models of Turkey, Belgium and the Netherlands were examined through exchange visits. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to explore the peculiarities of legislative and institutional structures, the best and worst practices, and approach principles.

RESULTS:

Some countries are more focused on exploring OD trends through effective and cost-efficient researches, with particular attention to new and emerging ODs. Other countries try to reach every single case of OD for compensation and rehabilitation. Each practice has advantages and shortcomings, but they are not mutually exclusive, and thus an effective combination is possible.

CONCLUSION:

Effective surveillance and registry approaches play a key role in the prevention of ODs. A well-designed system enables monitoring and assessment of OD prevalence and trends, and adoption of preventive measures while improving the effectiveness of redressing and compensation. A robust surveillance does not only provide protection of workers' health but also advances prevention of economic losses.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_transmissiveis Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Saf Health Work Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_transmissiveis Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Saf Health Work Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía
...