There Is No Difference in Radiographic Outcomes After Average 9 Years After Arthroscopic Partial Medial Meniscectomy for Both Posterior Horn Tears and Posterior Horn Root Tears.

PURPOSE: To compare the serial changes in radiographic outcomes in terms of the mechanical axis (MA) angle and medial joint space width (JSW) between medial meniscus posterior root tear (MM PRT) and non-root tear (MM NRT) after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). METHODS: Patients who underwent APM for degenerative MM PRT or MM NRT from January 1999 to July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred ten patients each in the MM PRT group and the MM NRT group, who were matched through propensity score matching (adjusting for confounding factors such as age, sex, body mass index, anatomic axis, cartilage state of the medial compartment, and follow-up period), were included in the study. The MA angle on weightbearing whole-leg radiographs and the medial JSW on weightbearing 45° flexion posteroanterior radiographs were measured to evaluate the radiographic outcomes. The serial changes were compared between radiographs taken before surgery, at postoperative 3 to 5 years, and at postoperative 5 years to the last follow-up. The linear mixed model was used to compare the changes in radiographic outcomes during the follow-up period between groups. RESULTS: The 2 groups were balanced with standardized mean differences of <0.2 after propensity score matching. Both the MM PRT and NRT groups showed increased varus alignment after surgery. However, there was no significant difference in the change in the MA angle during the follow-up period between groups (P = .182). The medial JSW also showed progression of joint space narrowing after surgery in both groups; however, there was no significant difference in the change in medial JSW during the follow-up period between groups (P = .270). CONCLUSION: The radiographic outcomes after partial meniscectomy in terms of the MA angle and medial JSW show comparable results between degenerative MM PRT and NRT after proper matching of confounding factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.