Parental Perception of the Importance of the Permanent First Molar in Their Children.
J Dent Child (Chic)
; 87(1): 26-30, 2020 Jan 15.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32151307
Purpose: To evaluate parental knowledge of the importance of the permanent first molar (PFM).
Methods: Three hundred and eighty parents filled a 22-item questionnaire assisted by a trained investigator. They were asked to indicate the correct answer from the given list of options in order to assess their awareness about the eruption sequence of primary and permanent teeth and the importance of PFMs. Assessment of parental attitude toward preventive management and treatment of carious or infected permanent teeth was done, together with their willingness to comply with the treatment options suggested for such teeth. The sequelae of caries in PFM and their effect on the growth and development of the face and jaws were assessed as well.
Results: Seventy-five percent and 72.4 percent of parents responded correctly about the number of primary and permanent teeth. When parents were asked about the chronology of tooth eruption, 53.9 percent of parents thought that the PFM erupted between 10 and 12 years of age. Almost 65 percent of the parents said they would start brushing their child's teeth after all the primary teeth erupt. Forty-five percent agreed to the extraction of PFMs, considering them to be primary teeth, as they felt unnecessary to treat a carious tooth that was going to exfoliate.
Conclusion: Parents often based their decision for dental treatment choices for their children on lack of information as they were unaware about the eruption and importance of PFM. There is a need to emphasize the importance of PFM during interaction with parents.
Methods: Three hundred and eighty parents filled a 22-item questionnaire assisted by a trained investigator. They were asked to indicate the correct answer from the given list of options in order to assess their awareness about the eruption sequence of primary and permanent teeth and the importance of PFMs. Assessment of parental attitude toward preventive management and treatment of carious or infected permanent teeth was done, together with their willingness to comply with the treatment options suggested for such teeth. The sequelae of caries in PFM and their effect on the growth and development of the face and jaws were assessed as well.
Results: Seventy-five percent and 72.4 percent of parents responded correctly about the number of primary and permanent teeth. When parents were asked about the chronology of tooth eruption, 53.9 percent of parents thought that the PFM erupted between 10 and 12 years of age. Almost 65 percent of the parents said they would start brushing their child's teeth after all the primary teeth erupt. Forty-five percent agreed to the extraction of PFMs, considering them to be primary teeth, as they felt unnecessary to treat a carious tooth that was going to exfoliate.
Conclusion: Parents often based their decision for dental treatment choices for their children on lack of information as they were unaware about the eruption and importance of PFM. There is a need to emphasize the importance of PFM during interaction with parents.
Buscar en Google
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Caries Dental
/
Diente Molar
Límite:
Child
/
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Dent Child (Chic)
Asunto de la revista:
ODONTOLOGIA
/
PEDIATRIA
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Article