Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variabilities in X-ray diagnostic reference levels.
Vanaudenhove, Thibault; Van Muylem, Alain; Howarth, Nigel; Gevenois, Pierre Alain; Tack, Denis.
Afiliación
  • Vanaudenhove T; Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC), Rue Ravenstein 36, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Van Muylem A; Department of Chest Medicine, Hôpital Erasme, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Howarth N; Department of Radiology, Clinique des Grangettes, 7 Chemin des Grangettes, 1224, Chêne-Bougeries, Switzerland.
  • Gevenois PA; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Tack D; Department of Radiology, Epicura, Clinique Louis Caty, 136 Rue Louis Caty, 7331, Baudour, Belgium. denis.tack@skynet.be.
Eur Radiol ; 30(8): 4641-4647, 2020 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270316
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the variability of X-ray diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) depending on the number of X-ray devices and data per device. METHODS: Dose-area products (DAP) were collected by the national nuclear control agency from the 590 devices installed in 345 medical centers in the country. From 2015 to 2017, the number of chest (postero-anterior (PA) view alone, and both postero-anterior and lateral views (PA/LAT)), abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine examinations collected in these centers ranged from 23,000 to 77,000. The impact of the number of devices and DAP data per device on DRLs' variabilities (95th confidence intervals divided by medians) is estimated using a bootstrapping method as a function of the number of devices and DAP per device. RESULTS: The DRLs' variabilities ranged from 30 to 200% depending on the number of devices and DAP data per device but stabilized at 30% when the number of devices was higher than 200 for chest PA and abdomen examinations, 300 for lumbar spine and pelvis examinations, and 400 for chest PA/LAT examinations, regardless of the number of DAP data per device. Extrapolations of our results suggest that thousands of devices are necessary to reduce DRLs' variabilities to 10%. CONCLUSION: DAP-related DRL variabilities are high but only moderately influenced by the number of DAP data per device and of devices provided this number is higher than 200 to 400 devices according to the type of examination. Harmonization of methods of data collection between the authorities of the EU states should be recommended. KEY POINTS: • DAP-related DRLs are not fixed values but ranges of values with at least 30% variability. • DAP-related DRLs strongly depend on the number of devices included when lower than 100. • If the number of devices included exceeds 200 to 400, the DRLs' variabilities do not depend on the number of DAP per device and should not exceed 30%.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiografía / Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiografía / Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Radiol Asunto de la revista: RADIOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica
...