Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
McPeake, Joanne; Boehm, Leanne M; Hibbert, Elizabeth; Bakhru, Rita N; Bastin, Anthony J; Butcher, Brad W; Eaton, Tammy L; Harris, Wendy; Hope, Aluko A; Jackson, James; Johnson, Annie; Kloos, Janet A; Korzick, Karen A; MacTavish, Pamela; Meyer, Joel; Montgomery-Yates, Ashley; Quasim, Tara; Slack, Andrew; Wade, Dorothy; Still, Mary; Netzer, Giora; Hopkins, Ramona O; Mikkelsen, Mark E; Iwashyna, Theodore J; Haines, Kimberley J; Sevin, Carla M.
Afiliación
  • McPeake J; Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Boehm LM; School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Hibbert E; School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
  • Bakhru RN; Department of Physiotherapy, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Bastin AJ; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunology, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Butcher BW; Department of Peri-operative Medicine, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Eaton TL; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Harris W; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Hope AA; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Jackson J; Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, New York, NY.
  • Johnson A; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
  • Kloos JA; Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Korzick KA; University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
  • MacTavish P; Geisinger Medical Center, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Danville, PA.
  • Meyer J; Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Montgomery-Yates A; Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Quasim T; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
  • Slack A; Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Wade D; School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
  • Still M; Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Netzer G; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hopkins RO; Emory University Hospital (Emory Healthcare), Atlanta, GA.
  • Mikkelsen ME; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Iwashyna TJ; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Haines KJ; Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT.
  • Sevin CM; Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, UT.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(4): e0088, 2020 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32426730
ABSTRACT
To understand from the perspective of patients who did, and did not attend ICU recovery programs, what were the most important components of successful programs and how should they be organized.

DESIGN:

International, qualitative study.

SETTING:

Fourteen hospitals in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. PATIENTS We conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of patients, 52 of whom had used an ICU recovery program and 14 whom had not.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Using content analysis, prevalent themes were documented to understand what improved their outcomes. Contrasting quotes from patients who had not received certain aspects of care were used to identify perceived differential effectiveness. Successful ICU recovery programs had five key components 1) Continuity of care; 2) Improving symptom status; 3) Normalization and expectation management; 4) Internal and external validation of progress; and 5) Reducing feelings of guilt and helplessness. The delivery of care which achieved these goals was facilitated by early involvement (even before hospital discharge), direct involvement of ICU staff, and a focus on integration across traditional disease, symptom, and social welfare needs.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this multicenter study, conducted across three continents, patients identified specific and reproducible modes of benefit derived from ICU recovery programs, which could be the target of future intervention refinement.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Explor Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Explor Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...