Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective, comparative evaluation of a deep neural network and dermoscopy in the diagnosis of onychomycosis.
Kim, Young Jae; Han, Seung Seog; Yang, Hee Joo; Chang, Sung Eun.
Afiliación
  • Kim YJ; Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Han SS; Department of Dermatology, I Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yang HJ; Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Chang SE; Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234334, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32525908
BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is the most common nail disorder and is associated with diagnostic challenges. Emerging non-invasive, real-time techniques such as dermoscopy and deep convolutional neural networks have been proposed for the diagnosis of this condition. However, comparative studies of the two tools in the diagnosis of onychomycosis have not previously been conducted. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the diagnostic abilities of a deep neural network (http://nail.modelderm.com) and dermoscopic examination in patients with onychomycosis. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in patients presenting with dystrophic features in the toenails. Clinical photographs were taken by research assistants, and the ground truth was determined either by direct microscopy using the potassium hydroxide test or by fungal culture. Five board-certified dermatologists determined a diagnosis of onychomycosis using the clinical photographs. The diagnosis was also made using the algorithm and dermoscopic examination. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients (mean age, 55.3; male, 43.3%) assessed between September 2018 and July 2019 were included in the analysis. The detection of onychomycosis using the algorithm (AUC, 0.751; 95% CI, 0.646-0.856) and that by dermoscopy (AUC, 0.755; 95% CI, 0.654-0.855) were seen to be comparable (Delong's test; P = 0.952). The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm at the operating point were 70.2% and 72.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis by the five dermatologists were 73.0% and 49.7%, respectively. The Youden index of the algorithm (0.429) was also comparable to that of the dermatologists' diagnosis (0.230±0.176; Wilcoxon rank-sum test; P = 0.667). CONCLUSIONS: As a standalone method, the algorithm analyzed photographs taken by non-physician and showed comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of onychomycosis to that made by experienced dermatologists and by dermoscopic examination. Large sample size and world-wide, multicentered studies should be investigated to prove the performance of the algorithm.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Onicomicosis / Dermoscopía / Dermatosis del Pie / Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Onicomicosis / Dermoscopía / Dermatosis del Pie / Aprendizaje Profundo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
...