Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification: A retrospective study.
Tong, Wenjuan; Zhang, Xiaoling; Luo, Jia; Pan, Fushun; Liang, Jinyu; Huang, Hui; Li, Manying; Cheng, Meiqing; Pan, Jiamin; Zheng, Yanling; Xie, Xiaoyan.
Afiliación
  • Tong W; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang X; Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Luo J; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Pan F; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Liang J; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Huang H; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li M; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cheng M; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Pan J; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zheng Y; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Xie X; Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 76(1): 85-98, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32538829
PURPOSE: To assess the value of conventional ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions with calcifications. METHODS: A total of 87 breast lesions with calcification were subjected to US, CEUS and mammography and divided into 3 groups: Group A (all cases), Group A1 (31 cases who underwent US and CEUS first followed by mammography), and Group A2 (56 cases who underwent mammography first followed by US and CEUS). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different methods in different groups. RESULTS: In Group A, the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of CEUS were 0.937, which were significantly higher than that of mammography (p < 0.05). In Group A1, the AUROC of CEUS were 0.842, which were not significantly different from that of US and mammography (p > 0.05). In Group A2, the AUROC of CEUS were 0.987, which were significantly higher than that of mammography and US (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on the mammography results, the combination of US and CEUS might improve the diagnostic efficacy in breast lesions with calcification.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Ultrasonografía / Imagen Multimodal Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Ultrasonografía / Imagen Multimodal Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / HEMATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...