Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bionic eye review - An update.
Nowik, Kamil; Langwinska-Wosko, Ewa; Skopinski, Piotr; Nowik, Katarzyna E; Szaflik, Jacek P.
Afiliación
  • Nowik K; Department of Management and Financial Science, School of Economics, Warszawa, Poland; Department of Ophthalmology, SPKSO (Samodzielny Publiczny Kliniczny Szpital Okulistyczny) Ophthalmic Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, 03-709 Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: kamil.nowik@intelmedi.pl.
  • Langwinska-Wosko E; Department of Ophthalmology, SPKSO (Samodzielny Publiczny Kliniczny Szpital Okulistyczny) Ophthalmic Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, 03-709 Warsaw, Poland.
  • Skopinski P; Department of Ophthalmology, SPKSO (Samodzielny Publiczny Kliniczny Szpital Okulistyczny) Ophthalmic Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, 03-709 Warsaw, Poland; Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
  • Nowik KE; Department of Ophthalmology, SPKSO (Samodzielny Publiczny Kliniczny Szpital Okulistyczny) Ophthalmic Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, 03-709 Warsaw, Poland.
  • Szaflik JP; Department of Ophthalmology, SPKSO (Samodzielny Publiczny Kliniczny Szpital Okulistyczny) Ophthalmic Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw, 03-709 Warsaw, Poland.
J Clin Neurosci ; 78: 8-19, 2020 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571603
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To date, reviews of bionic eye have concentrated on implants which were used in human trials in the developed countries. This is the main restriction of this systematic review examines, however this review discusses worldwide advances in retinal prosthetic research, assesses engineering features and clinical progress of recent implant trials, and identifies potential future research areas in the field of bionic implants.

METHODS:

A literature review searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEExplore was performed using the PRISMA Guidelines for Systematic Review. We included peer-reviewed papers in the review which demonstrated progress in human or animal trials and papers with described innovative bionic eye engineering design. For each trial, a characteristic of the device, engineering solution, and latest clinical outcomes were presented.

RESULTS:

Eleven prosthetic projects fulfilled met our inclusion criteria and were ordered by stimulation location. Four have recently finished human trials, three are having conducted multi- or singlecenter human trials, and three are in preclinical animal testing stage. FDA has approved Argus II (FDA 2013, CE 2011); the Alpha-IMS (CE 2013) has been approved and obtained BCVA with Landolt-C test has taken into a multicenter clinical research. New approaches will be presented using alternating magnetic fields, low-intensity focused ultrasounds, optogenetics, implementing ionic gradients across neural cell membranes or influencing neurotransmitter levels will be presented in the review.

CONCLUSION:

Several bionic eye have successfully achieved visual perception in animals and/or humans. However, many things need to be improved and engineering difficulties are to be resolved before bionic eye will be capable of fully and safely bring back vision functions. New approaches could improve medical outcome of future bionic eye.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis Visuales Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prótesis Visuales Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Neurosci Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
...