Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development and Validation of a Vaginal Anterior Repair Simulation Model for Surgical Training.
O'Meara, Amanda; Ramaseshan, Aparna S; O'Sullivan, David M; Tunitsky-Bitton, Elena.
Afiliación
  • Ramaseshan AS; From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford.
  • O'Sullivan DM; Department of Research Administration, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, CT.
  • Tunitsky-Bitton E; From the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 27(2): e290-e294, 2021 02 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675628
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aims of this study were to design and to validate a surgical simulation model for vaginal anterior colporrhaphy.

METHODS:

Obstetrics and gynecology residents were divided into two groups "novice" and "advanced." "Expert" group comprised female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) fellows and faculty. All subjects were recorded performing anterior colporrhaphy using the simulation model. Deidentified, silent videos of recorded performances were evaluated by a blinded reviewer using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a procedure-specific assessment, based on the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology milestone evaluation. Analysis of variance was used for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS:

Thirty-seven participants included 13 novices, 18 advanced residents, and six experts. The experts scored significantly higher than both resident groups in each of the domains of the OSATS and the procedure assessment. The mean OSATS score for experts was 32.30 (±6.06) (maximum, 35); novice, 17.15 (±5.84); and advanced, 21.11 (±5.61) (P = 0.001). The experts' scores for the procedure assessment (maximum, 25) was 23.00 (±3.95); novice, 10.62 (±4.70); and advanced, 14.33 (±4.73) (P < 0.001). The two trainee groups did not differ significantly in their overall performance. Most trainees (29 [94%]) evaluated the model as a useful tool in learning this procedure.

CONCLUSIONS:

This low-fidelity model can be constructed easily using common materials. The model cost is $43.92 with reusable components ($11 per use). Higher scores by experts versus trainees confirm construct validity of this model. It may serve as a valuable simulation tool allowing trainees to improve their surgical technique for anterior colporrhaphy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Modelos Educacionales / Colpotomía / Entrenamiento Simulado / Ginecología / Internado y Residencia / Modelos Anatómicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Modelos Educacionales / Colpotomía / Entrenamiento Simulado / Ginecología / Internado y Residencia / Modelos Anatómicos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article
...