Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study of Regorafenib Versus Placebo in Advanced/Metastatic, Treatment-Refractory Liposarcoma: Results from the SARC024 Study.
Riedel, Richard F; Ballman, Karla V; Lu, Yao; Attia, Steven; Loggers, Elizabeth T; Ganjoo, Kristen N; Livingston, Michael B; Chow, Warren; Wright, Jennifer; Ward, John H; Rushing, Daniel; Okuno, Scott H; Reed, Damon R; Liebner, David A; Keedy, Vicki L; Mascarenhas, Leo; Davis, Lara E; Ryan, Christopher; Reinke, Denise K; Maki, Robert G.
Afiliación
  • Riedel RF; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Ballman KV; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Lu Y; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Attia S; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Loggers ET; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Ganjoo KN; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Livingston MB; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Chow W; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
  • Wright J; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Ward JH; Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Rushing D; Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Okuno SH; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Reed DR; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Liebner DA; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Keedy VL; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Mascarenhas L; Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Davis LE; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Ryan C; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Reinke DK; Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration (SARC), Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Maki RG; Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Oncologist ; 25(11): e1655-e1662, 2020 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32701199
ABSTRACT
LESSONS LEARNED The results from the liposarcoma cohort of SARC024 confirm previously published data and do not support the routine use of regorafenib in this patient population. Continued exploration of novel therapies, including combination approaches, is warranted for a patient population in whom limited treatment options exist.

BACKGROUND:

Regorafenib is a multitargeted kinase inhibitor with a kinase profile overlapping, but distinct from, pazopanib, an agent approved for recurrent and metastatic non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma. We conducted a randomized, phase II study of regorafenib versus placebo in refractory liposarcoma patients.

METHODS:

Patients with advanced or metastatic, treatment-refractory liposarcoma were randomized 11 to receive regorafenib 160 mg or placebo once daily (3 weeks on, 1 week off). Patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma only were excluded. Crossover for placebo was allowed upon progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), according to RECIST version 1.1.

RESULTS:

Forty-eight subjects with liposarcoma (34 dedifferentiated, 12 myxoid/round cell, 2 pleomorphic) were enrolled. Median PFS was 1.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-3.67) months for regorafenib versus 2.07 (95% CI, 1.64-3.44) months for placebo; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.85 (95% CI, 0.46, 1.58), p = .62. No responses were seen on regorafenib. One PR was observed on placebo. Median overall survival was 6.46 (95% CI, 4.16-23.48) months for regorafenib and 4.89 (95% CI, 3.02-9.77) months for placebo, stratified HR, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.31-1.40), p = .28). Treatment-related adverse events were similar to the known safety profile of regorafenib.

CONCLUSION:

Regorafenib did not appear to improve PFS in treatment-refractory liposarcoma. No new significant safety signals were observed.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis / 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Compuestos de Fenilurea / Piridinas / Liposarcoma Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis / 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Compuestos de Fenilurea / Piridinas / Liposarcoma Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...