Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Terminology for melanocytic skin lesions and the MPATH-Dx classification schema: A survey of dermatopathologists.
Radick, Andrea C; Reisch, Lisa M; Shucard, Hannah L; Piepkorn, Michael W; Kerr, Kathleen F; Elder, David E; Barnhill, Raymond L; Knezevich, Stevan R; Oster, Natalia; Elmore, Joann G.
Afiliación
  • Radick AC; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Reisch LM; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Shucard HL; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Piepkorn MW; Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Kerr KF; Dermatopathology Northwest, Bellevue, Washington, USA.
  • Elder DE; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Barnhill RL; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Knezevich SR; Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences and Letters Research University, Paris, France.
  • Oster N; Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences and Letters Research University, Paris, France.
  • Elmore JG; Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(6): 733-738, 2021 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935869
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Diagnostic terms used in histopathology reports of cutaneous melanocytic lesions are not standardized. We describe dermatopathologists' views regarding diverse diagnostic terminology and the utility of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-Dx) for categorizing melanocytic lesions.

METHODS:

July 2018-2019 survey of board-certified and/or fellowship-trained dermatopathologists with experience interpreting melanocytic lesions.

RESULTS:

Among 160 participants, 99% reported witnessing different terminology being used for the same melanocytic lesion. Most viewed diverse terminology as confusing to primary care physicians (98%), frustrating to pathologists (83%), requiring more of their time as a consultant (64%), and providing necessary clinical information (52%). Most perceived that adoption of the MPATH-Dx would improve communication with other pathologists and treating physicians (87%), generally be a change for the better (80%), improve patient care (79%), be acceptable to clinical colleagues (68%), save time in pathology report documentation (53%), and protect from malpractice (51%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Most dermatopathologists view diverse terminology as contributing to miscommunication with clinicians and patients, adversely impacting patient care. They view the MPATH-Dx as a promising tool to standardize terminology and improve communication. The MPATH-Dx may be a useful supplement to conventional pathology reports. Further revision and refinement are necessary for widespread clinical use.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Clasificación / Melanocitos / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cutan Pathol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Clasificación / Melanocitos / Melanoma Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cutan Pathol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...