Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Biesty, Linda; Meskell, Pauline; Glenton, Claire; Delaney, Hannah; Smalle, Mike; Booth, Andrew; Chan, Xin Hui S; Devane, Declan; Houghton, Catherine.
Afiliación
  • Biesty L; Evidence Synthesis Ireland, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. LINDA.BIESTY@nuigalway.ie.
  • Meskell P; Qualitative Research in Trials Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. LINDA.BIESTY@nuigalway.ie.
  • Glenton C; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, 26 Upper Newcastle, Galway, H91 E3YV, Ireland. LINDA.BIESTY@nuigalway.ie.
  • Delaney H; Evidence Synthesis Ireland, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
  • Smalle M; Qualitative Research in Trials Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
  • Booth A; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Chan XHS; Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Devane D; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Houghton C; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, 26 Upper Newcastle, Galway, H91 E3YV, Ireland.
Syst Rev ; 9(1): 256, 2020 11 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33148320
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a sense of urgency in the research community in their bid to contribute to the evidence required for healthcare policy decisions. With such urgency, researchers experience methodological challenges to maintain the rigour and transparency of their work. With this in mind, we offer reflections on our recent experience of undertaking a rapid Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis (QES).

METHODS:

This process paper, using a reflexive approach, describes a rapid QES prepared during, and in response to, the COVID-19 pandemic.

FINDINGS:

This paper reports the methodological decisions we made and the process we undertook. We place our decisions in the context of guidance offered in relation to rapid reviews and previously conducted QESs. We highlight some of the challenges we encountered in finding the balance between the time needed for thoughtfulness and comprehensiveness whilst providing a rapid response to an urgent request for evidence.

CONCLUSION:

The need for more guidance on rapid QES remains, but such guidance needs to be based on actual worked examples and case studies. This paper and the reflections offered may provide a useful framework for others to use and further develop.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía Viral / Edición / Proyectos de Investigación / Literatura de Revisión como Asunto / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Medicina Basada en la Evidencia / Toma de Decisiones / Pandemias Tipo de estudio: Policy_brief / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Syst Rev Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonía Viral / Edición / Proyectos de Investigación / Literatura de Revisión como Asunto / Infecciones por Coronavirus / Medicina Basada en la Evidencia / Toma de Decisiones / Pandemias Tipo de estudio: Policy_brief / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Syst Rev Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda
...