Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring mechanisms underlying learning from deliberate reflection: An experimental study.
Ribeiro, Ligia Maria Cayres; Mamede, Silvia; de Brito, Eliza Maria; Moura, Alexandre Sampaio; de Faria, Rosa Malena Delbone; Schmidt, Henk G.
Afiliación
  • Ribeiro LMC; Department of Medical Education Development, José do Rosário Vellano University (UNIFENAS) Medical School, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Mamede S; Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Brito EM; Department of Medical Education Development, José do Rosário Vellano University (UNIFENAS) Medical School, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Moura AS; Department of Medical Education Development, José do Rosário Vellano University (UNIFENAS) Medical School, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • de Faria RMD; Department of Popaedeutics, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Schmidt HG; Education and Research Center, Santa Casa BH, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Med Educ ; 55(3): 404-412, 2021 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33159364
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Previous research suggests that, relative to generating a differential diagnosis, deliberate reflection during practice with clinical cases fosters learning from a subsequently studied scientific text and promotes interest in the subject matter. The present experiment aimed to replicate these findings and to examine whether motivational or cognitive mechanisms, or both, underlie the positive effects of reflection.

METHODS:

A total of 101 5th-year medical students participated in an experiment containing four phases Students (a) diagnosed two clinical cases of jaundice-related diseases either through deliberate reflection or differential diagnosis; (b) reported their situational interest and awareness of knowledge gaps; (c) studied a text about jaundice, either under free or restricted time; and (d) recalled the text. Outcome measures were text-recall, situational interest and awareness of knowledge gaps.

RESULTS:

A main effect of diagnostic approach on recall of the text was found, with the reflection group recalling more studied material than the differential diagnosis group (means 72.56 vs 58.80; P = .01). No interaction between diagnostic approach and study time (free or restricted) emerged, nor was there a main effect of the latter. Relative to the differential diagnosis group, students who reflected upon the cases scored significantly higher on both situational interest (means 4.45 vs 3.99, P < .001) and awareness of knowledge gaps (means 4.13 vs 3.85, P < .01).

DISCUSSION:

Relative to generating differential diagnoses, reflection upon clinical cases increased learning outcomes on a subsequent study task, an effect that was independent of study time, suggesting that cognitive mechanisms underlie this effect, rather than increases in motivation to study. However, higher scores on situational interest and awareness of knowledge gaps and a tendency towards larger gains when time was free suggest that higher motivation may also contribute to learning from reflection.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estudiantes de Medicina / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Educ Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estudiantes de Medicina / Educación de Pregrado en Medicina Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Educ Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil
...