Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factorial Structure of the Serbian Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms - Evidence for Three Factors of Negative Symptoms.
Ristic, Ivan; Jerotic, Stefan; Zebic, Mirjana; Savic, Bojana; Vukovic, Vuk; Russo, Manuela; Voskresenski, Tatjana; Jovanovic, Nikolina; Maric, Nada P.
Afiliación
  • Ristic I; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Jerotic S; Clinic for Psychiatry, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Zebic M; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Savic B; Clinic for Psychiatry, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Vukovic V; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Russo M; Clinic for Psychiatry, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Voskresenski T; Clinic for Psychiatry, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
  • Jovanovic N; Special Hospital for Psychiatric Diseases 'Dr Slavoljub Bakalovic', Psychiatry, Vrsac, Serbia.
  • Maric NP; Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry - WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol ; 11: 570356, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33192856
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Negative symptoms are a common occurrence in patients with psychosis spectrum disorders. Previous analysis of the latent structure of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) - which was developed to advance the assessment of negative symptomatology - showed two underlying sub-domains (Motivation and Pleasure; Expression). Recent findings indicate that a more complex structure might be more applicable.

Aim:

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Serbian version of the CAINS in a sample of outpatients (N = 67) with psychosis spectrum disorders. Materials and

Methods:

Negative symptoms and general level of psychopathology were assessed with Serbian translations of the CAINS, the 53-item version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the 24-item version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out on the CAINS items, and correlation analyses were done to assess its convergent and discriminant validity.

Results:

Our results showed an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92). PCA revealed a three-component solution consisting of Expressiveness and Motivation for Social and Family Relationships (Factor 1), Motivation for Vocational Activities (Factor 2), and Motivation for Recreation (Factor 3). Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations with the Negative symptoms domain of the BPRS (Factor 1, 0.695, p < 0.01; Factor 2, 0.352, p < 0.05; Factor 3, 0.452, p < 0.01). When assessing discriminant validity, weak correlations were found with BPRS and BSI scores.

Conclusion:

The Serbian version of CAINS is a valid, reliable and useful tool for the assessment of negative symptomatology. Our findings support a three-factor structure of CAINS, which indicates that the construct is more complex than envisaged by the original conceptualization of two distinct factors.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Front Psychol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
...