Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Including older rural adults in research: Practical guidance for addressing the NIH Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy.
Croff, Raina; Gowen, L Kris; Lindauer, Allison; Shofner, Sabrina; Brown, Kim; Eckstrom, Elizabeth.
Afiliación
  • Croff R; NIA-Layton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Gowen LK; Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Lindauer A; NIA-Layton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Shofner S; NIA-Layton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Brown K; Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
  • Eckstrom E; Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Oregon Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 4(5): 431-436, 2020 Feb 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33244432
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The NIH Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy has implications for increasing older adult (OA) participation in research. This study aimed to understand influential factors and facilitators to rural OA research participation.

METHODS:

Thirty-seven rural adults aged ≥66 years participated in focus groups in community centers in four Oregon "non-metro" counties. Transcribed discussions were coded using open-axial coding by an interdisciplinary analytical team.

RESULTS:

Ages were 66-96 (mean 82.2) years. Majority were women (64%) and white (86%). Primary, interrelated discussion themes were Motivation and Facilitators, Perceptions of Research, and Barriers to Research Participation. Participants were motivated to engage in research because they believed research had implications for improved longevity and quality of life and potentially benefited future generations. Motivational factors influencing participation included self-benefit and improving others' lives, opportunities to socialize and learn about current research, research transparency (funding, time commitment, and requirements), and financial compensation. Perceptions influencing trustworthiness in research included funding source (industry/non-industry) and familiarity with the research institution. Barriers to research participation included transportation and concern about privacy and confidentiality. Suggestions for making research participation easier included researchers coming to rural communities and meeting participants in places where OAs gather and providing transportation and hotel accommodations.

CONCLUSION:

Lessons learned offer practical guidance for research teams as they address the new NIH Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy. Including OAs in research in ways that motivate and facilitate participation will be critical for a robust representation across the lifespan and in tailoring treatments to the specific needs of this population.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Transl Sci Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...