Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors influencing daily treatment choices in multiple sclerosis: practice guidelines, biomarkers and burden of disease.
Berger, Thomas; Adamczyk-Sowa, Monika; Csépány, Tünde; Fazekas, Franz; Fabjan, Tanja Hojs; Horáková, Dana; Ledinek, Alenka Horvat; Illes, Zsolt; Kobelt, Gisela; Jazbec, Sasa Sega; Klímová, Eleonóra; Leutmezer, Fritz; Rejdak, Konrad; Rozsa, Csilla; Sellner, Johann; Selmaj, Krzysztof; Stouracˇ, Pavel; Szilasiová, Jarmila; Turcˇáni, Peter; Vachová, Marta; Vanecková, Manuela; Vécsei, László; Havrdová, Eva Kubala.
Afiliación
  • Berger T; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.
  • Adamczyk-Sowa M; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland.
  • Csépány T; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
  • Fazekas F; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Fabjan TH; Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
  • Horáková D; Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Ledinek AH; Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Illes Z; Department of Neurology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Kobelt G; European Health Economics AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Jazbec SS; Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Klímová E; Department of Neurology, University of Presov and Teaching Hospital of J. A. Reiman, Presov, Slovakia.
  • Leutmezer F; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Rejdak K; Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
  • Rozsa C; Department of Neurology, Jahn Ferenc Dél-pesti Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Sellner J; Department of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria, and Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Selmaj K; Department of Neurology, University of Warmia-Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
  • Stouracˇ P; Department of Neurology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Szilasiová J; Department of Neurology, P. J. Safárik University Kosice and University Hospital of L. Pasteur Kosice, Slovakia.
  • Turcˇáni P; Department of Neurology, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Vachová M; Centrum Teplice, Teplice, Czech Republic.
  • Vanecková M; Department of Radiology, MRI Unit, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Vécsei L; Department of Neurology and MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
  • Havrdová EK; Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord ; 13: 1756286420975223, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33335562
ABSTRACT
At two meetings of a Central European board of multiple sclerosis (MS) experts in 2018 and 2019 factors influencing daily treatment choices in MS, especially practice guidelines, biomarkers and burden of disease, were discussed. The heterogeneity of MS and the complexity of the available treatment options call for informed treatment choices. However, evidence from clinical trials is generally lacking, particularly regarding sequencing, switches and escalation of drugs. Also, there is a need to identify patients who require highly efficacious treatment from the onset of their disease to prevent deterioration. The recently published European Committee for the Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis/European Academy of Neurology clinical practice guidelines on pharmacological management of MS cover aspects such as treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and are based on expert consensus statements. However, the recommendations constitute an excellent framework that should be adapted to local regulations, MS center capacities and infrastructure. Further, available and emerging biomarkers for treatment guidance were discussed. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters are deemed most reliable at present, even though complex assessment including clinical evaluation and laboratory parameters besides imaging is necessary in clinical routine. Neurofilament-light chain levels appear to represent the current most promising non-imaging biomarker. Other immunological data, including issues of immunosenescence, will play an increasingly important role for future treatment algorithms. Cognitive impairment has been recognized as a major contribution to MS disease burden. Regular evaluation of cognitive function is recommended in MS patients, although no specific disease-modifying treatment has been defined to date. Finally, systematic documentation of real-life data is recognized as a great opportunity to tackle unresolved daily routine challenges, such as use of sequential therapies, but requires joint efforts across clinics, governments and pharmaceutical companies.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ther Adv Neurol Disord Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria
...