Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The added value of periodontal measurements for identification of diabetes among Saudi adults.
Talakey, Arwa A; Hughes, Francis; Almoharib, Hani; Al-Askar, Mansour; Bernabé, Eduardo.
Afiliación
  • Talakey AA; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Hughes F; Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Almoharib H; Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Al-Askar M; Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Bernabé E; Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Periodontol ; 92(1): 62-71, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507569
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aims of this study were to develop a prediction model for identification of individuals with diabetes based on clinical and perceived periodontal measurements; and to evaluate its added value when combined with standard diabetes screening tools.

METHODS:

The study was carried out among 250 adults attending primary care clinics in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia). The study adopted a case-control approach, where diabetes status was first ascertained, and the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC), Canadian Diabetes Risk questionnaire (CANRISK), and periodontal examinations were carried out afterward.

RESULTS:

A periodontal prediction model (PPM) including three periodontal indicators (missing teeth, percentage of sites with pocket probing depth ≥6 mm, and mean pocket probing depth) had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.694 (95% Confidence Interval 0.612-0.776) and classified correctly 62.4% of participants. The FINDRISC and CANRISK tools had AUCs of 0.766 (95% CI 0.690-0.843) and 0.821 (95% CI 0.763-0.879), respectively. The addition of the PPM significantly improved the AUC of FINDRISC (P = 0.048) but not of CANRISK (P = 0.144), with 26.8% and 9.8% of participants correctly reclassified, respectively. Finally, decision curve analysis showed that adding the PPM to both tools would result in net benefits among patients with probability scores lower than 70%.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study showed that periodontal measurements could play a role in identifying individuals with diabetes, and that addition of clinical periodontal measurements improved the performance of FINDRISC and CANRISK.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...