Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV: Validation and impact evaluation at a large UK hospital trust.
Morris, Thomas C; Bird, Paul W; Horvath-Papp, Eva; Dhillon, Jasminder K; May, Shoshanna; Tang, Julian W.
Afiliación
  • Morris TC; Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Bird PW; Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Horvath-Papp E; Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Dhillon JK; Point of Care Testing Team, Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • May S; Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Tang JW; Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
J Med Virol ; 93(8): 5146-5151, 2021 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559907
Despite vaccination programs and antivirals, influenza remains a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality. The Xpert Xpress Flu/respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) test is a leading influenza point-of-care test, but its evaluation has been limited to nasopharyngeal samples. In addition, the clinical impacts of Xpress Flu/RSV have not yet been quantified. We evaluated the performance of Xpress Flu/RSV at three locations in a UK Hospital Trust against an existing laboratory assay. Multiple upper respiratory tract sample types were included. In addition, we calculated time saved by Xpert, and the associations between Xpert use and rates of early patient isolation and antiviral prescription as recorded at the time of the laboratory result being telephoned out. A total of 642 patients were included in the diagnostic performance analysis. There were 177 laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A, 7 influenza B and 86 RSV. For influenza A, sensitivity and specificity were 96.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.8%-98.8%) and 98.1% (CI: 96.4%-99.1%), respectively. This was sustained across all locations and sample types. The negative predictive value was 98.7% (CI: 97.2%-99.4%). The median amount of time saved was 27.1 h. Xpert use was associated with sixfold higher rates of isolation and threefold higher rates of antiviral prescribing by the time the laboratory result was available. Sensitivity for RSV was lower at 86.0% (95% CI: 76.9%-92.6%). Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV reliably detects influenza A infection and has significant clinical impacts. Cartridge optimization is required to enable accurate multiplexing, including from a range of sample types.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_enfermedades_transmissibles Asunto principal: Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio / Gripe Humana / Pruebas en el Punto de Atención / Hospitales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Child / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Med Virol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_enfermedades_transmissibles Asunto principal: Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio / Gripe Humana / Pruebas en el Punto de Atención / Hospitales Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Child / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Med Virol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article
...