Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Translation, validation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian (Farsi) version of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS-P).
Keramati, Mohammad Reza; Abbaszadeh-Kasbi, Ali; Keshvari, Amir; Ahmadi-Tafti, Seyed Mohsen; Behboudi, Behnam; Kazemeini, Alireza; Fazeli, Mohammad Sadegh.
Afiliación
  • Keramati MR; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Abbaszadeh-Kasbi A; Colorectal Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Keshvari A; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Ahmadi-Tafti SM; Colorectal Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Behboudi B; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Kazemeini A; Colorectal Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Fazeli MS; Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0247054, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630867
INTRODUCTION: Low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer affects bowel function after the operation, causing a group of symptoms known as LAR Syndrome (LARS). LARS score is a patient-reported questionnaire to assess bowel dysfunction after the LAR operation. This study performed to validate the Persian (Farsi) translation of the LARS score and to investigate the psychometric properties of the score. The impact of LARS on the Quality of Life (QoL) of patients was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LARS score was translated into Persian. Participants with a history of rectal cancer and low anterior resection were asked to complete the LARS score questionnaire. They were also asked a single question evaluating the impact of bowel function on QoL. Discriminative validity, convergent validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the questionnaire were calculated. A group of patients completed the score twice to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. RESULTS: From 358 patients with rectal cancer, 101 participants completed the Persian questionnaire. Answers of a high fraction of participants showed a moderate/perfect fit between their LARS score and their QoL. The Persian score demonstrated good convergent validity. It was able to differentiate between participants in terms of gender and T staging of the primary tumor. The score had high reliability. CONCLUSION: The Persian translation of the LARS score has excellent psychometric properties compared to previous translations in other languages. Therefore, it is a valid and reliable questionnaire to assess LARS.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán
...