Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient related factors affecting in-hospital costs of a TURP procedure.
Sagen, Erik; Javid, Reza; Liivrand, Lina; Bencherki, Ali; Nelzén, Olle; Peeker, Ralph; Månsson, Marianne.
Afiliación
  • Sagen E; Department of Urology, NU Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.
  • Javid R; Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Liivrand L; Research and Development Centre, Hospital of Skaraborg, Skovde, Sweden.
  • Bencherki A; Financial Department, Hospital of Skaraborg, Skovde, Sweden.
  • Nelzén O; Department of Urology, Hospital of Skaraborg, Skovde, Sweden.
  • Peeker R; Research and Development Centre, Hospital of Skaraborg, Skovde, Sweden.
  • Månsson M; Institute of Clinical Sciences at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Scand J Urol ; 55(4): 324-330, 2021 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33645423
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Treatment costs of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) are a substantial economic burden that will continue to increase in the future as a result of the ageing male population and increasing health awareness. The true costs for surgical interventions against BPE have been difficult to quantify as treatment costs strongly depend on the performance setting and may also vary among different healthcare systems, regions and institutions. The purpose of this study was to disclose the in-hospital costs and main expense items associated with a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Methods:

A cohort of men subjected to TURP due to BPE was analysed during a 3-year period (2017-2019). All in-hospital expenses were registered using an electronic spreadsheet. Patient background and perioperative variables were registered using retrospective chart reviews.

Results:

A total of 122 men were available for final analysis. Of these, 70 men were operated on due to bothersome LUTS and 52 men due to urinary retention. The mean and median (inter quartile range) cost per patient was €4025 and €3702 (2961 - 4390), respectively. The main drivers of total cost were length of stay, the surgical procedure and anaesthesia related costs. Factors associated with increasing total cost per patient were increasing age, prostate volume, presence of urinary retention, occurrence of complications, increasing catheter time and length of stay.

Conclusion:

The main factor that influences total cost for an elective TURP procedure is the occurrence of postoperative complications. Our findings firmly underscore the indispensability to employ every possible means to avoid and prevent complications of any kind.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Urol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Resección Transuretral de la Próstata Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Urol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia
...