Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of sensory interventions on the quality of life of long-term care residents: a scoping review.
Backman, Chantal; Demery-Varin, Melissa; Cho-Young, Danielle; Crick, Michelle; Squires, Janet.
Afiliación
  • Backman C; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada chantal.backman@uottawa.ca.
  • Demery-Varin M; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Cho-Young D; Care of the Elderly, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Crick M; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Squires J; School of Nursing, University of Ottawa Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open ; 11(3): e042466, 2021 03 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33762231
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

PURPOSE:

Residents in long-term care exhibit diminishing senses (hearing, sight, taste, smell or touch). The purpose of this study was to examine the available literature on the impact of sensory interventions on the quality of life of residents living in long-term care settings.

METHODS:

We conducted a mixed-methods scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Seven databases (Medline (Ovid), PubMed (non-Medline-Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), Ageline, PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 1 December 2020) were searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for sensory interventions using a two-step process. Eligible studies underwent data extraction and results were synthesised descriptively.

RESULTS:

We screened 5551 titles and abstracts. A total of 52 articles met our inclusion criteria. Some interventions involved only one sense hearing (n=3), sight (n=12), smell (n=4) and touch (n=15). Other interventions involved multiple senses (n=18). We grouped the interventions into 16 categories (music programmes, environmental white noise, bright light interventions, visual stimulations, olfactory stimulations, massages, therapeutic touch, tactile stimulations, physical activity plus night-time programmes, pet therapies, various stimuli interventions, Snoezelen rooms, motor and multisensory based strategies, Namaste care, environmental modifications and expressive touch activities).

CONCLUSION:

This preliminary review summarised some of the available sensory interventions that will help inform a series of future systematic reviews on each of the specific interventions. The evidence-based knowledge for sensory interventions will also inform a future audit programme for assessing the presence of sensory interventions in long-term care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Cuidados a Largo Plazo Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Cuidados a Largo Plazo Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...