Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gene flow in commercial alfalfa (Medicago sativa subsp. sativa L.) seed production fields: Distance is the primary but not the sole influence on adventitious presence.
Kesoju, Sandya R; Kramer, Matthew; Brunet, Johanne; Greene, Stephanie L; Jordan, Amelia; Martin, Ruth C.
Afiliación
  • Kesoju SR; Department of Agriculture, Columbia Basin College, Pasco, Washington, United States of America.
  • Kramer M; Statistics Group, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Brunet J; Vegetable Crops Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
  • Greene SL; Agricultural Genetic Resources Preservation Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
  • Jordan A; Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, Washington, United States of America.
  • Martin RC; Forage Seed and Cereal Research, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248746, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765070
ABSTRACT
In insect-pollinated crops, gene flow is affected by numerous factors including crop characteristics, mating system, life history, pollinators, and planting management practices. Previous studies have concentrated on the impact of distance between genetically engineered (GE) and conventional fields on adventitious presence (AP) which represents the unwanted presence of a GE gene. Variables other than distance, however, may affect AP. In addition, some AP is often present in the parent seed lots used to establish conventional fields. To identify variables that influence the proportion of AP in conventional alfalfa fields, we performed variable selection regression analyses. Analyses based on a sample-level and a field-level analysis gave similar, though not identical results. For the sample-level model, distance from the GE field explained 66% of the variance in AP, confirming its importance in affecting AP. The area of GE fields within the pollinator foraging range explained an additional 30% of the variation in AP in the model. The density of alfalfa leafcutting bee domiciles influenced AP in both models. To minimize AP in conventional alfalfa seed fields, management practices should focus on optimizing isolation distances while also considering the size of the GE pollen pool within the pollinator foraging range, and the foraging behavior of pollinators.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente / Productos Agrícolas / Medicago sativa Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente / Productos Agrícolas / Medicago sativa Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...