Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of different ceramic surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composite to lithium disilicate ceramic.
Ueda, Nanako; Takagaki, Tomohiro; Nikaido, Toru; Takahashi, Rena; Ikeda, Masaomi; Tagami, Junji.
Afiliación
  • Ueda N; Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
  • Takagaki T; Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University.
  • Nikaido T; Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University.
  • Takahashi R; Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
  • Ikeda M; Department of Oral Prosthetic Engineering, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
  • Tagami J; Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Dent Mater J ; 40(5): 1073-1079, 2021 Sep 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33883329
This study aimed to evaluate the bonding abilities and long-term durability of different repair agents when applied to lithium disilicate ceramics (LDS). Blocks of IPS e.max CAD were prepared and divided into four groups according to the surface treatment: Monobond Etch & Prime (ME), K-etchant GEL+Clearfil Universal Bond (UB), Bondmer Lightless (BL), and K-etchant GEL+G-Multi Primer (GMP). All treated ceramic specimens were bonded to resin composite and light-cured. The micro-shear bond strength was measured after 24 h of water storage or 5,000 thermocycles. ME and BL showed significantly higher initial bond strengths than UB and GMP (p<0.05). After 5,000 thermocycles, there was no significant difference in ME (p>0.05), but BL and GMP showed considerable reduction in bond strength (p<0.05); moreover, the samples of UB were all de-bonded before testing. ME and BL proved to be effective surface treatment materials for LDS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Cementos de Resina Idioma: En Revista: Dent Mater J Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo / Cementos de Resina Idioma: En Revista: Dent Mater J Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article
...