Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgeon vs Pathologist for Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula: Results from the Randomized Multicenter RECOPANC Study.
Timme, Sylvia; Kayser, Gian; Werner, Martin; Litkevych, Stanislav; Màlyi, Ambrus Gabor; Keck, Tobias; Bronsert, Peter; Wellner, Ulrich Friedrich; Petrova, Ekaterina; Honselmann, Kim C.
Afiliación
  • Timme S; Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Core Facility for Histopathology and Digital Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Kayser G; Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Werner M; Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Core Facility for Histopathology and Digital Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Litkevych S; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Màlyi AG; Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Institute of Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Keck T; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Bronsert P; Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Core Facility for Histopathology and Digital Pathology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
  • Wellner UF; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Petrova E; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
  • Honselmann KC; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany. Electronic address: kim.honselmann@uksh.de.
J Am Coll Surg ; 232(6): 935-945.e2, 2021 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33887486
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surgically assessed pancreatic texture has been identified as the strongest predictor of postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, texture is a subjective parameter with no proven reliability or validity. Therefore, a more objective parameter is needed. In this study, we evaluated the fibrosis level at the pancreatic neck resection margin and correlated fibrosis and all clinico-pathologic parameters collected over the course of the Pancreatogastrostomy vs Pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction (RECOPANC) study. STUDY

DESIGN:

The RECOPANC trial was a multicenter randomized prospective trial of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. There were 261 hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides allocated for histopathologic analyses. Pancreatic fibrosis was scored from 0 to III (no fibrosis up to severe fibrosis) by 2 blinded independent pathologists. All variables possibly associated with POPF were entered into a generalized linear model for multivariable analysis.

RESULTS:

The fibrosis grade and pancreatic texture were scored in all 261 patients. In POPF B/C (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B or C) patients, 71% had a soft pancreas, and fibrosis grades were distributed as follows 48% with score 0, 28% with score I, 20% with score II, and 7% with score III, respectively. Fibrosis grading showed substantial inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.74) and correlated positively with hard pancreatic texture (p < 0.05). In univariable analysis, area under the curve (AUC) for POPF B/C prediction was higher for fibrosis grade than for pancreatic texture (0.71 vs 0.59). In multivariate analysis, the following predictors were selected sex, surgeon volume, pancreatic texture, and fibrosis grade. However, the addition of pancreatic texture only led to an incremental improvement (AUC 0.794 vs 0.819).

CONCLUSIONS:

Histologically evaluated pancreatic fibrosis is an easily applicable and highly reproducible POPF predictor and superior to surgically evaluated pancreatic texture. Future studies might use fibrosis grade for risk stratification in pancreatoduodenectomy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Páncreas / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Fístula Pancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Surg Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Páncreas / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Fístula Pancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomía Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Surg Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
...