Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experiences of Patient-Centered Care Among Japanese and Australian Cancer Outpatients: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study.
Carey, Mariko L; Uchida, Megumi; Zucca, Alison C; Okuyama, Toru; Akechi, Tatsuo; Sanson-Fisher, Rob W.
Afiliación
  • Carey ML; Health Behavior Research Collaborative, Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Uchida M; Priority Research Centre for Health Behavior, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Zucca AC; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Okuyama T; Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Akechi T; Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Sanson-Fisher RW; Health Behavior Research Collaborative, Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
J Patient Exp ; 8: 23743735211007690, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34179419
There have been few international comparisons of patient-centered cancer care delivery. This study aimed to compare the experiences of patient-centered care (PCC) of Japanese and Australian radiation oncology patients. Participants were adults with cancer attending a radiotherapy appointment at a Japanese or Australian clinic. Participants completed a survey asking about 10 indicators of PCC. Overall, 259 Japanese and 285 Australian patients participated. Compared with Japanese participants, Australian participants were significantly more likely to report receiving information about: what the treatment is, and the short-term and long-term side effects of treatment. A higher proportion of Australian participants reported being asked whether they wanted a friend or family member present at the consultation. There were no differences in the frequency with which Japanese and Australian participants were asked by their clinicians about whether they were experiencing physical side effects or emotional distress. International differences highlight the (1) need to exercise caution when generalizing from one country to another; and (2) the importance of context in understanding PCC delivery and the subsequent design of quality improvement interventions.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Exp Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Patient Exp Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...