Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
International comparison of guidelines for management of impetigo: a systematic review.
Hall, Leanne M; Gorges, Hilary J; van Driel, Mieke; Magin, Parker; Francis, Nick; Heal, Clare F.
Afiliación
  • Hall LM; College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Mackay Clinical School, Mackay, QLD, Australia.
  • Gorges HJ; College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Mackay Clinical School, Mackay, QLD, Australia.
  • van Driel M; Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Magin P; Discipline of General Practice, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
  • Francis N; GP Synergy Regional Training Organisation, NSW & ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Mayfield, Australia.
  • Heal CF; School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Fam Pract ; 39(1): 150-158, 2022 01 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184743
BACKGROUND: Impetigo is a common superficial skin infection that affects people worldwide and is usually treated with antibiotics; therefore, its management has implications for global antibiotic stewardship. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and narrative synthesis compares and contrasts international impetigo management guidelines. METHODS: Guidelines for treatment of impetigo that were produced by a national authority; available to primary care physicians; and published since 2008 were included. Following a comprehensive search strategy, data extraction from eligible studies was performed independently in duplicate. Details of antiseptic and antibiotic treatment; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment; and conservative management and preventative measures were tabulated and analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Fifty-one guidelines were included from 42 different countries. All guidelines recommended systemic antibiotics, 78% of these only for widespread lesions or failure of topical antibiotic treatment. The first-line systemic antibiotic treatment was restricted to narrow-spectrum options in 21 (41%) whilst 7 (14%) recommended only broad-spectrum antibiotics first-line. Thirty-four (67%) guidelines included recommendations for topical antibiotic use. Twenty guidelines (39%) did not mention antiseptic treatment for impetigo. Guidelines did not always provide clear indications for different treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Despite potentially equal efficacy to systemic antibiotics, only two-thirds of guidelines include topical antibiotic options. Many fail to include recommendations for non-antibiotic treatments such as antiseptics, preventative measures and conservative management, despite potential for antibiotic-sparing. Provision of clear definitions of disease severity and indications for treatment would enhance the ability of clinicians to adhere to recommendations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018117770.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Impétigo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Fam Pract Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Impétigo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Fam Pract Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...