Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Patel, Agastya; Spychalski, Piotr; Corrao, Giulia; Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara A; Glynne-Jones, Robert; Garcia-Aguilar, Julio; Kobiela, Jarek.
Afiliación
  • Patel A; Department of General Surgery, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Spychalski P; Department of General Surgery, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • Corrao G; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Jereczek-Fossa BA; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Glynne-Jones R; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Garcia-Aguilar J; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Kobiela J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Acta Oncol ; 60(10): 1308-1316, 2021 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34308767
BACKGROUND: Short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy (SCRT-CCT) has emerged as a promising alternative to the long course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) regimen in locally advanced rectal cancer management. The systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed at summarizing current evidence on SCRT-CCT and comparing it to LCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library were searched using a predefined search strategy returning 3314 articles. This review included 11 studies (6 randomized trials and 5 non-randomized studies) on SCRT-CCT regimen based on seven different cohorts. Weighted arithmetic means and forest plots were generated to determine summary estimates. RESULTS: The probability of achieving pathological complete response (pCR) was higher with SCRT-CCT compared to LCRT (risk ratio [RR] = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-2.19). No statistically significant difference in 3-year overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups (RR= 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.14). The weighted arithmetic mean of 3-year OS and pCR was 83.6% versus 80.9%, and 24.5% versus 13.6% for SCRT-CCT and LCRT, respectively. R0 resection and T-downstaging rates ranged from 69.2-100% to 47-75% for SCRT-CCT, and 71-92.3% and 41-75% for LCRT, respectively. The regimens had similar compliance, postoperative, and late toxicity, however, acute toxicity rates varied primarily due to differences in treatment protocols. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the ability of SCRT-CCT to produce improved tumor response with comparable OS, R0 resection, and T-downstaging at the cost of increased acute toxicity. However, heterogeneity in treatment protocols across studies makes it difficult to provide definitive conclusions regarding the regimen. Several ongoing trials are expected to provide further evidence confirming the findings of RAPIDO trial and detail appropriate SCRT-CCT protocols to improve oncological outcomes, minimize toxicity, and determine its effectiveness as the standard-of-care for locally advanced rectal cancer patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Terapia Neoadyuvante Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Terapia Neoadyuvante Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia
...