Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term Follow Up of Ileal Ureteral Replacement for Complex Ureteral Strictures: Single Institution Study.
Launer, Bryn M; Redger, Kirk D; Koslov, David S; Sax-Bolder, Anessa N; Higuchi, Ty T; Windsperger, Andrew P; Flynn, Brian J.
Afiliación
  • Launer BM; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Redger KD; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Koslov DS; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Sax-Bolder AN; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Higuchi TT; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Windsperger AP; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
  • Flynn BJ; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: brian.flynn@cuanschutz.edu.
Urology ; 157: 257-262, 2021 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34310914
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To report our 16-year experience with ileal ureter interposition for complex ureteral stricture. Ureteral reconstruction continues to evolve to include less invasive techniques to successfully manage ureteral stricture. However, long, complex, obliterative and especially radiated ureteral strictures are not amenable to less invasive techniques and may require Ileal ureter interposition. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Retrospective review of a single institution's ureteral reconstruction database was performed. Demographics, operative details, success rate, complication rate, and length of follow-up were noted. Unilateral replacements utilized ileal ureteral interposition. Success rate was defined as no need for further open intervention.

RESULTS:

Between 2003 and 2019, 188 ureteral reconstructions were performed, of which 46 required ileal ureter interposition. Of these 46 patients, 10 required bilateral reconstruction. Average age was 53 years, 26 (57%) were female. The average stricture length was 9.1 cm (2-20 cm). Stricture etiology included iatrogenic causes (n = 24, 52%), radiation causes (n = 12; 26%), vascular disease (n = 3; 7%), and idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (n = 3; 7%). Forty-three surgeries were performed by open abdominal approach; 3 were performed robotically. The average length of operation was 412 minutes, blood loss 417 mL and LOS was 10 days. At mean follow up of 4.4 years (1-16 years), overall success rate was 83%, with 17% (n = 8) patients requiring subsequent major surgery (5 successful ureteral revision, 3 nephrectomy) and 11 (24%) patients experiencing a major complication.

CONCLUSION:

In our long-term follow up of over 4 years, ileal ureteral interposition remains a successful option for complex ureteral strictures in properly selected patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uréter / Obstrucción Ureteral / Íleon Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Colombia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uréter / Obstrucción Ureteral / Íleon Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Colombia
...