Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contours of citizen science: a vignette study.
Haklay, Muki; Fraisl, Dilek; Greshake Tzovaras, Bastian; Hecker, Susanne; Gold, Margaret; Hager, Gerid; Ceccaroni, Luigi; Kieslinger, Barbara; Wehn, Uta; Woods, Sasha; Nold, Christian; Balázs, Bálint; Mazzonetto, Marzia; Ruefenacht, Simone; Shanley, Lea A; Wagenknecht, Katherin; Motion, Alice; Sforzi, Andrea; Riemenschneider, Dorte; Dorler, Daniel; Heigl, Florian; Schaefer, Teresa; Lindner, Ariel; Weißpflug, Maike; Maciuliene, Monika; Vohland, Katrin.
Afiliación
  • Haklay M; Department of Geography, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
  • Fraisl D; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
  • Greshake Tzovaras B; Université de Paris, INSERM U1284, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), 8bis Rue Charles V, Paris 75004, France.
  • Hecker S; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Puschstrasse 4, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
  • Gold M; Department of Ecosystem Services, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Berlin, Germany.
  • Hager G; Museum für Naturkunde-Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.
  • Ceccaroni L; European Citizen Science Association (ECSA), c/o Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
  • Kieslinger B; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
  • Wehn U; Earthwatch, Mayfield House, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DE, UK.
  • Woods S; Centre for Social Innovation GmbH, Linke Wienzeile 246, Vienna 1150, Austria.
  • Nold C; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, AX Delft 2611, The Netherlands.
  • Balázs B; Earthwatch, Mayfield House, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7DE, UK.
  • Mazzonetto M; Department of Geography, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
  • Ruefenacht S; Environmental Social Science Research Group (ESSRG), Ferenciek Tere 2, Budapest 1053, Hungary.
  • Shanley LA; European Citizen Science Association (ECSA), c/o Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
  • Wagenknecht K; European Citizen Science Association (ECSA), c/o Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
  • Motion A; Nelson Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 550 N Park ST, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
  • Sforzi A; Technische Hochschule Wildau, Hochschulring 1, Wildau 15745, Germany.
  • Riemenschneider D; The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Dorler D; Maremma Natural History Museum, Strada Corsini 5, Grosseto 58100, Italy.
  • Heigl F; European Citizen Science Association (ECSA), c/o Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstr. 43, Berlin 10115, Germany.
  • Schaefer T; University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, Vienna 1180, Austria.
  • Lindner A; University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, Vienna 1180, Austria.
  • Weißpflug M; Centre for Social Innovation GmbH, Linke Wienzeile 246, Vienna 1150, Austria.
  • Maciuliene M; Université de Paris, INSERM U1284, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI), 8bis Rue Charles V, Paris 75004, France.
  • Vohland K; Museum für Naturkunde-Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany.
R Soc Open Sci ; 8(8): 202108, 2021 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34457323
ABSTRACT
Citizen science has expanded rapidly over the past decades. Yet, defining citizen science and its boundaries remained a challenge, and this is reflected in the literature-for example in the proliferation of typologies and definitions. There is a need for identifying areas of agreement and disagreement within the citizen science practitioners community on what should be considered as citizen science activity. This paper describes the development and results of a survey that examined this issue, through the use of vignettes-short case descriptions that describe an activity, while asking the respondents to rate the activity on a scale from 'not citizen science' (0%) to 'citizen science' (100%). The survey included 50 vignettes, of which five were developed as clear cases of not-citizen science activities, five as widely accepted citizen science activities and the others addressing 10 factors and 61 sub-factors that can lead to controversy about an activity. The survey has attracted 333 respondents, who provided over 5100 ratings. The analysis demonstrates the plurality of understanding of what citizen science is and calls for an open understanding of what activities are included in the field.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: R Soc Open Sci Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: R Soc Open Sci Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...