Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How COVID-19 kick-started online learning in medical education-The DigiMed study.
Stoehr, Fabian; Müller, Lukas; Brady, Adrian; Trilla, Antoni; Mähringer-Kunz, Aline; Hahn, Felix; Düber, Christoph; Becker, Nicole; Wörns, Marcus-Alexander; Chapiro, Julius; Hinrichs, Jan Bernd; Akata, Deniz; Ellmann, Stephan; Huisman, Merel; Koff, David; Brinkmann, Sebastian; Bamberg, Fabian; Zimmermann, Oscar; Traikova, Nikoleta I; Marquardt, Jens U; Chang, D-H; Rengier, Fabian; Auer, Timo A; Emrich, Tilman; Muehler, Felix; Schmidberger, Heinz; Baeßler, Bettina; Dos Santos, Daniel Pinto; Kloeckner, Roman.
Afiliación
  • Stoehr F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Müller L; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Brady A; Radiology Department, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
  • Trilla A; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
  • Mähringer-Kunz A; Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Hahn F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Düber C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Becker N; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Wörns MA; Center for Quality Assurance and Development, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Chapiro J; Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
  • Hinrichs JB; Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
  • Akata D; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Ellmann S; Department of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Huisman M; Institute of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Koff D; Institute of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Brinkmann S; Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  • Bamberg F; Department of General, Visceral, Tumor and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Zimmermann O; Department of Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Traikova NI; University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • Marquardt JU; Department of Radiology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
  • Chang DH; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Lübeck, Germany.
  • Rengier F; Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Auer TA; Department of Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Emrich T; Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
  • Muehler F; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Schmidberger H; Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
  • Baeßler B; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany.
  • Dos Santos DP; University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Kloeckner R; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0257394, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34547031
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to far-reaching restrictions of social and professional life, affecting societies all over the world. To contain the virus, medical schools had to restructure their curriculum by switching to online learning. However, only few medical schools had implemented such novel learning concepts. We aimed to evaluate students' attitudes to online learning to provide a broad scientific basis to guide future development of medical education.

METHODS:

Overall, 3286 medical students from 12 different countries participated in this cross-sectional, web-based study investigating various aspects of online learning in medical education. On a 7-point Likert scale, participants rated the online learning situation during the pandemic at their medical schools, technical and social aspects, and the current and future role of online learning in medical education.

RESULTS:

The majority of medical schools managed the rapid switch to online learning (78%) and most students were satisfied with the quantity (67%) and quality (62%) of the courses. Online learning provided greater flexibility (84%) and led to unchanged or even higher attendance of courses (70%). Possible downsides included motivational problems (42%), insufficient possibilities for interaction with fellow students (67%) and thus the risk of social isolation (64%). The vast majority felt comfortable using the software solutions (80%). Most were convinced that medical education lags behind current capabilities regarding online learning (78%) and estimated the proportion of online learning before the pandemic at only 14%. In order to improve the current curriculum, they wish for a more balanced ratio with at least 40% of online teaching compared to on-site teaching.

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrates the positive attitude of medical students towards online learning. Furthermore, it reveals a considerable discrepancy between what students demand and what the curriculum offers. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic might be the long-awaited catalyst for a new "online era" in medical education.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación a Distancia / Educación Médica / COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Educación a Distancia / Educación Médica / COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
...