Gloss retention of direct composites and corresponding CAD/CAM composite blocks.

OBJECTIVES: To compare gloss retention of four different resin composites with their corresponding CAD/CAM composite blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four direct resin composites (Filtek Supreme XTE A2 Body (3M, USA), Tetric EvoCeram A2 (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), GrandioSO x-tra A2 (VOCO, Germany), G-aenial Universal A2 (GC, Japan)), and their corresponding CAD/CAM composite blocks were tested. A total of 288 samples were prepared and three different tests were performed: brushing, exposition to acidic fluoride gel and exposition to alcoholic solution. Gloss values were obtained by means of a glossmeter at T0 before aging and T60 after 1 h of aging. RESULTS: Mean gloss values ranged from 0.9 after brushing tests to 79.0 after the alcohol test witnessing a high gloss variability depending on the materials and the aging test. Statistical analysis by means of two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Fisher's LSD post-hoc test revealed significant differences between materials, storage media, and their interactions. CONCLUSION: Gloss retention seems to be dependent on the composite type (direct or CAD/CAM block) and composite brand and varies in respect to the type of aging. CAD/CAM materials showed a higher resistance toward alcohol exposure.