Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy on the Survival Rate of Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Gastric Origin.
Tidadini, Fatah; Abba, Julio; Quesada, Jean-Louis; Baudrant, Magalie; Bonne, Aline; Foote, Alison; Faucheron, Jean-Luc; Glehen, Olivier; Villeneuve, Laurent; Arvieux, Catherine.
Afiliación
  • Tidadini F; Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Abba J; Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France.
  • Quesada JL; Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Baudrant M; Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Bonne A; Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Foote A; Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Faucheron JL; Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Glehen O; Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
  • Villeneuve L; Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France.
  • Arvieux C; Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 53(4): 971-979, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34677795
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Our objective was to compare the results of PIPAC associated with systemic chemotherapy (PIPAC_CHEM) with those of systemic chemotherapy alone (ONLY_CHEM) in patients with gastric PC without metastasis other than peritoneal, and the WHO performance status < 3.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective, single center, comparative non-randomized study. Seventeen PIPAC_CHEM patients were compared to 29 ONLY_CHEM patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months from diagnosis of PC.

RESULTS:

Ninety-eight patients were screened and 46 were included (PIPAC_CHEM, n = 17; ONLY_CHEM, n = 29). The PIPAC_ CHEM population was significantly younger (median 64 years [56; 68] vs 74 years [61; 79]; p = 0.0054). Median PIPAC session per patient is 2 [1-3]. Six-month survival was significantly higher in the PIPAC_CHEM group than in the ONLY_CHEM group 16/17 (94.1% [65-99.2]) vs 19/29 (65.5% [45.4-79.7]), respectively; p = 0.029. Over the entire follow-up, median survival [95% CI] was 12.8 months [7.2-34.3] with PIPAC vs 9.1 months [5.4-11.5] without, p = 0.056. At 6 months, median length of additional hospitalization was significantly less for PIPAC_CHEM (median 2 days [2-7]) than without PIPAC (median 11 days [3-21]) (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION:

The overall survival at 6 months after the diagnosis of carcinomatosis was significantly better for PIPAC_CHEM patients. This difference appears to continue until at least 18 months. At 6 months, days of additional hospitalization was significantly less in the PIPAC_CHEM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT 04,879,953.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneales / Carcinoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastrointest Cancer Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneales / Carcinoma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Gastrointest Cancer Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia
...