Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Molecular systematics of teioid lizards (Teioidea/Gymnophthalmoidea: Squamata) based on the analysis of 48 loci under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment.
Goicoechea, Noemí; Frost, Darrel R; De la Riva, Ignacio; Pellegrino, Katia C M; Sites, Jack; Rodrigues, Miguel T; Padial, José M.
Afiliación
  • Goicoechea N; Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
  • Frost DR; Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY, 10024, USA.
  • De la Riva I; Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
  • Pellegrino KCM; Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Avenida Professor Artur Riedel 275, Diadema, São Paulo, CEP 09972-270, Brazil.
  • Sites J; Departament of Biology and M.L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
  • Rodrigues MT; Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, CEP: 05508-090, Brazil.
  • Padial JM; Section of Amphibians and Reptiles, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Cladistics ; 32(6): 624-671, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34727678
ABSTRACT
We infer phylogenetic relationships within Teioidea, a superfamily of Nearctic and Neotropical lizards, using nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic analyses relied on parsimony under tree-alignment and similarity-alignment, with length variation (i.e. gaps) treated as evidence and as absence of evidence, and maximum-likelihood under similarity-alignment with gaps as absence of evidence. All analyses produced almost completely resolved trees despite 86% of missing data. Tree-alignment produced the shortest trees, the strict consensus of which is more similar to the maximum-likelihood tree than to any of the other parsimony trees, in terms of both number of clades shared, parsimony cost and likelihood scores. Comparisons of tree costs suggest that the pattern of indels inferred by similarity-alignment drove parsimony analyses on similarity-aligned sequences away from more optimal solutions. All analyses agree in a majority of clades, although they differ from each other in unique ways, suggesting that neither the criterion of optimality, alignment nor treatment of indels alone can explain all differences. Parsimony rejects the monophyly of Gymnophthalmidae due to the position of Alopoglossinae relative to Teiidae, whereas support of Gymnophthalmidae by maximum-likelihood was low. We address various nomenclatural issues, including Gymnophthalmidae Fitzinger, 1826 being an older name than Teiidae Gray, 1827. We recognize three families in the arrangement Alopoglossidae + (Teiidae + Gymnophthalmidae). Within Gymnophthalmidae we recognize Cercosaurinae, Gymnophthalminae, Rhachisaurinae and Riolaminae in the relationship Cercosaurinae + (Rhachisaurinae + (Riolaminae + Gymnophthalminae)). Cercosaurinae is composed of three tribes-Bachiini, Cercosaurini and Ecpleopodini-and Gymnophthalminae is composed of three-Gymnophthalmini, Heterodactylini and Iphisini. Within Teiidae we retain the currently recognized three subfamilies in the arrangement Callopistinae + (Tupinambinae + Teiinae). We also propose several genus-level changes to restore the monophyly of taxa.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cladistics Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cladistics Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España
...