Dilatation and curettage in endometrial cancer. What is the correlation with hysterectomy histology? A 14 years retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the concordance between preoperative endometrial sampling histopathology performed by conventional dilatation and curettage (D&C) and final histopathological diagnosis after total hysterectomy concerning tumor grade and subtype in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: In this comparative retrospective study, 203 women with endometrial cancer were included who underwent at first dilatation and curettage and then total hysterectomy. The preoperative histopathological report obtained by dilatation and curettage was compared with the final histopathology after total hysterectomy to assess the accuracy of endometrial sampling. RESULTS: Comparison of preoperative with postoperative histopathological results showed an overall 5.9% and 10.9% discordance regarding endometrial cancer histological subtype and grade, respectively. Six (4.9%) of the patients with preoperative grade 1 were grade 2 and 1 (0.8%) was found to be grade 3. Three (8.3%) of the patients with preoperative grade 2 were found to be grade 3 after hysterectomy. Discordance is higher for endometrioid endometrial cancer grade 2 (25%) compared with grade 1 (5.7%) and 3 (18.8%). CONCLUSION: Patients should be informed and consent for the potential discrepancy between the pre and postoperative histopathological features of malignancy. This discrepancy may result in either under or overtreatment. Thus, it should be accounted for when counseling for a major operation.