Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics and Prognosis of Stroke in Living Donor Renal Transplant Recipients.
Mizuno, Takafumi; Hoshino, Takao; Ishizuka, Kentaro; Toi, Sono; Nishimura, Ayako; Takahashi, Shuntaro; Wako, Sho; Kitagawa, Kazuo.
Afiliación
  • Mizuno T; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Hoshino T; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Ishizuka K; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Toi S; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Nishimura A; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Takahashi S; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Wako S; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
  • Kitagawa K; Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital.
J Atheroscler Thromb ; 29(9): 1393-1408, 2022 Sep 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34776472
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

We aimed to determine the characteristics and vascular outcomes of stroke in renal transplant (RT) recipients and compare them with those in patients on hemodialysis (HD) and those with no renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS:

In this prospective observational study, 717 patients (mean age, 70.8 years; male, 60.5%) with acute ischemic stroke within one week of onset were consecutively enrolled and followed for one year. The patients were classified into three groups (1) living donor RT recipients (n=27); (2) patients on maintenance HD before the index stroke (n=39); and (3) those with no history of RRT (n=651). The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS:

Diabetic nephropathy was the most common reason for RRT in both RT and HD patients. RT patients were more likely to have embolic stroke of undetermined source (33.3%) than others, whereas HD patients more often had cardioembolism (51.3%). No difference was observed in the MACE risk between the patients in RT and non-RRT groups (annual rate, 11.3% vs. 13.1%; log-rank P=0.82; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.92 [0.29-2.98]). In contrast, HD patients had a greater risk of MACE than those with no RRT (annual rate, 28.2% vs. 13.1%; log-rank P=0.019; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.24 [1.16-4.3]).

CONCLUSIONS:

The underlying etiologies of stroke differed in RT and HD patients. The one-year risk of MACE for stroke patients who had received an RT was lower than that for patients undergoing HD and comparable with that of patients with no RRT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Atheroscler Thromb Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Atheroscler Thromb Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article
...