Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Probiotics Evaluation in Oncological Surgery: A Systematic Review of 36 Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing 21 Diverse Formulations.
Cogo, Elise; Elsayed, Mohamed; Liang, Vivian; Cooley, Kieran; Guerin, Christilynn; Psihogios, Athanasios; Papadogianis, Peter.
Afiliación
  • Cogo E; Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, 1255 Sheppard Ave. E., Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada.
  • Elsayed M; Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, 1255 Sheppard Ave. E., Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada.
  • Liang V; Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, 1255 Sheppard Ave. E., Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada.
  • Cooley K; Patterson Institute for Integrative Oncology Research, Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, 1255 Sheppard Ave. E., Toronto, ON M2K 1E2, Canada.
  • Guerin C; School of Public Health, Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine (ARCCIM), University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, Australia.
  • Psihogios A; Pacific College of Health Sciences, San Diego, CA 92108, USA.
  • Papadogianis P; National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, Lismore 2480, Australia.
Curr Oncol ; 28(6): 5192-5214, 2021 12 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34940074
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Objectives were to evaluate probiotics safety and efficacy in oncological surgery.

METHODS:

Systematic review methodology guided by Cochrane, PRISMA, SWiM, and CIOMS. Protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018086168).

RESULTS:

36 RCTs (on 3305 participants) and 6 nonrandomized/observational studies were included, mainly on digestive system cancers. There was evidence of a beneficial effect on preventing infections, with 70% of RCTs' (21/30) direction of effect favoring probiotics. However, five RCTs (17%) favored controls for infections, including one trial with RR 1.57 (95% CI 0.79, 3.12). One RCT that changed (balanced) its antibiotics protocol after enrolling some participants had mortality risk RR 3.55 (95% CI 0.77, 16.47; 7/64 vs. 2/65 deaths). The RCT identified with the most promising results overall administered an oral formulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 + Lactobacillus plantarum + Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 + Saccharomyces boulardii. Methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias, with only five RCTs judged as low risk-of-bias.

CONCLUSIONS:

This large evidence synthesis found encouraging results from most formulations, though this was contrasted by potential harms from a few others, thus validating the literature that "probiotics" are not homogeneous microorganisms. Given microbiome developments and infections morbidity, further high-quality research is warranted using those promising probiotics identified herein.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Probióticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Probióticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Oncol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...