Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A guide to value of information methods for prioritising research in health impact modelling.
Jackson, Christopher; Johnson, Robert; de Nazelle, Audrey; Goel, Rahul; de Sá, Thiago Hérick; Tainio, Marko; Woodcock, James.
Afiliación
  • Jackson C; MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Johnson R; MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; and Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • de Nazelle A; Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Goel R; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • de Sá TH; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; and Center for Epidemiological Research in Nutrition and Health, University of Sao Paulo.
  • Tainio M; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; and Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Woodcock J; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Epidemiol Methods ; 10(1): 20210012, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35127249
ABSTRACT
Health impact simulation models are used to predict how a proposed policy or scenario will affect population health outcomes. These models represent the typically-complex systems that describe how the scenarios affect exposures to risk factors for disease or injury (e.g. air pollution or physical inactivity), and how these risk factors are related to measures of population health (e.g. expected survival). These models are informed by multiple sources of data, and are subject to multiple sources of uncertainty. We want to describe which sources of uncertainty contribute most to uncertainty about the estimate or decision arising from the model. Furthermore, we want to decide where further research should be focused to obtain further data to reduce this uncertainty, and what form that research might take. This article presents a tutorial in the use of Value of Information methods for uncertainty analysis and research prioritisation in health impact simulation models. These methods are based on Bayesian decision-theoretic principles, and quantify the expected benefits from further information of different kinds. The expected value of partial perfect information about a parameter measures sensitivity of a decision or estimate to uncertainty about that parameter. The expected value of sample information represents the expected benefit from a specific proposed study to get better information about the parameter. The methods are applicable both to situationswhere the model is used to make a decision between alternative policies, and situations where the model is simply used to estimate a quantity (such as expected gains in survival under a scenario). This paper explains how to calculate and interpret the expected value of information in the context of a simple model describing the health impacts of air pollution from motorised transport. We provide a general-purpose R package and full code to reproduce the example analyses.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Methods Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Methods Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...