Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-reported outcomes associated with cancer screening: a systematic review.
Kim, Ashley; Chung, Karen C; Keir, Christopher; Patrick, Donald L.
Afiliación
  • Kim A; GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA. akim@grailbio.com.
  • Chung KC; GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA.
  • Keir C; GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., CA, Menlo Park, USA.
  • Patrick DL; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 223, 2022 Mar 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35232405
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Multi-cancer early detection tests have been developed to enable earlier detection of multiple cancer types through screening. As reflected by patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the psychosocial impact of cancer screening is not yet clear. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of cancer screening through PRO assessment.

METHODS:

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of articles from January 2000 to August 2020 for relevant publications assessing the psychosocial impact of cancer screening before and within 1 year after screening in the general asymptomatic population, including following receipt of results. Studies focused on diagnostic evaluation or involving patients previously diagnosed with cancer were excluded.

RESULTS:

In total, 31 studies (12 randomized controlled trials; 19 observational studies) were included, reflecting PRO assessments associated with lung, breast, colorectal, anal, ovarian, cervical, and prostate cancer screening procedures. The most commonly assessed construct was symptoms of anxiety, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Cancer-specific distress and worry were also assessed using a broad range of measures. Overall, individuals tolerated screening procedures well with no major psychosocial effects. Of note, increases in symptoms of anxiety and levels of distress and worry were generally found prior to communication of screening results and following communication of indeterminate or positive results that required further testing. These negative psychosocial effects were, however, not long-lasting and returned to baseline relatively soon after screening. Furthermore, individuals with higher cancer risk, such as current smokers and those with a family history of cancer, tended to have higher levels of anxiety and distress throughout the screening process, including following negative or indeterminate results.

CONCLUSIONS:

The psychosocial impact of cancer screening is relatively low overall and short-lived, even following false-positive test results. Individuals with a higher risk of cancer tend to experience more symptoms of anxiety and distress during the screening process; thus, more attention to this group is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ansiedad / Estrés Psicológico / Depresión / Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ansiedad / Estrés Psicológico / Depresión / Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...