Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Outcomes Compared with Those of Surgical Resection.
De la Garza-Ramos, Cynthia; Montazeri, S Ali; Croome, Kristopher P; LeGout, Jordan D; Sella, David M; Cleary, Sean; Burns, Justin; Mathur, Amit K; Overfield, Cameron J; Frey, Gregory T; Lewis, Andrew R; Paz-Fumagalli, Ricardo; Ritchie, Charles A; McKinney, J Mark; Mody, Kabir; Patel, Tushar; Devcic, Zlatko; Toskich, Beau B.
Afiliación
  • De la Garza-Ramos C; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Montazeri SA; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Croome KP; Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • LeGout JD; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Sella DM; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Cleary S; Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Burns J; Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Mathur AK; Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Overfield CJ; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Frey GT; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Lewis AR; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Paz-Fumagalli R; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Ritchie CA; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • McKinney JM; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Mody K; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Patel T; Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Devcic Z; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
  • Toskich BB; Division of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. Electronic address: Toskich.Beau@mayo.edu.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 33(7): 775-785.e2, 2022 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35346857
PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of radiation segmentectomy (RS) versus standard-of-care surgical resection (SR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multisite, retrospective analysis of treatment-naïve patients who underwent either RS or SR was performed. The inclusion criteria were solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤8 cm in size, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Cohort performance status of 0-1, and absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Target tumor and overall progression, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival rates were assessed. Outcomes were censored for liver transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were included (RS, 57; SR, 66). Tumor size, Child-Pugh class, albumin-bilirubin score, platelet count, and fibrosis stage were significantly different between cohorts (P ≤ .01). Major adverse events (AEs), defined as grade ≥3 per the Clavien-Dindo classification, occurred in 0 patients in the RS cohort vs 13 (20%) patients in the SR cohort (P < .001). Target tumor progression occurred in 3 (5%) patients who underwent RS and 5 (8%) patients who underwent SR. Overall progression occurred in 19 (33%) patients who underwent RS and 21 (32%) patients who underwent SR. The median overall TTP was 21.9 and 29.4 months after RS and SR, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5-28.2 and 18.5-40.3, respectively; P = .03). Overall TTP subgroup analyses showed no difference between treatment cohorts with fibrosis stages 3-4 (P = .26) and a platelet count of <150 × 109/L (P = .29). The overall progression hazard ratio for RS versus SR was not significant per the multivariate Cox regression analysis (1.16; 95% CI, 0.51-2.63; P = .71). The median overall survival was not reached for either of the cohorts. Propensity scores were calculated but were too dissimilar for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: RS and SR were performed in different patient populations, which limits comparison. RS approached SR outcomes, with a lower incidence of major AEs, in patients who were not eligible for hepatectomy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma Hepatocelular / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article
...